Persistent Pain After Hysteroscopic Sterilization With Microinserts
- 1 February 2008
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 111 (2) , 511-512
Abstract
Hysteroscopic sterilization using tubal microinsert devices is an increasingly common method of contraception. Postprocedure pain is typically minimal and brief, adding to the popularity of this method. This report describes a case of intractable pain after placement of microinserts, ultimately requiring removal of the inserts. A 31-year-old gravida 4 para 4 woman underwent an uncomplicated office hysteroscopic tubal occlusion for permanent birth control. Subsequent to the procedure, she had significant bilateral pelvic pain that failed all attempts at conservative management and required removal of the microinserts for pain relief. Hysteroscopic placement of tubal microinserts for sterilization may occasionally be associated with intractable pelvic pain requiring removal of the devices.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Essure: Hysteroscopic SterilizationJournal of Midwifery & Women's Health, 2006
- Case report of failed tubal occlusion using Essure™ pbc (permanent birth control) hysteroscopic sterilisation procedureAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2006
- Office hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: A critical cost analysisJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2005
- Hysteroscopic tubal sterilizationObstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America, 2004
- Microinsert nonincisional hysteroscopic sterilizationObstetrics & Gynecology, 2003
- Hysteroscopic sterilization using a micro-insert device: results of a multicentre Phase II studyHuman Reproduction, 2003