An objective analysis of the dynamic nature of field capacity
- 7 October 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 45 (10)
Abstract
Field capacity is one of the most commonly used, and yet poorly defined, soil hydraulic properties. Traditionally, field capacity has been defined as the amount of soil moisture after excess water has drained away and the rate of downward movement has materially decreased. Unfortunately, this qualitative definition does not lend itself to an unambiguous quantitative approach for estimation. Because of the vagueness in defining what constitutes “drainage of excess water” from a soil, the estimation of field capacity has often been based upon empirical guidelines. These empirical guidelines are either time, pressure, or flux based. In this paper, we developed a numerical approach to estimate field capacity using a flux‐based definition. The resulting approach was implemented on the soil parameter data set used by Schaap et al. (2001), and the estimated field capacity was compared to traditional definitions of field capacity. The developed modeling approach was implemented using the HYDRUS‐1D software with the capability of simultaneously estimating field capacity for multiple soils with soil hydraulic parameter data. The Richards equation was used in conjunction with the van Genuchten‐Mualem model to simulate variably saturated flow in a soil. Using the modeling approach to estimate field capacity also resulted in additional information such as (1) the pressure head, at which field capacity is attained, and (2) the drainage time needed to reach field capacity from saturated conditions under nonevaporative conditions. We analyzed the applicability of the modeling‐based approach to estimate field capacity on real‐world soils data. We also used the developed method to create contour diagrams showing the variation of field capacity with texture. It was found that using benchmark pressure heads to estimate field capacity from the retention curve leads to inaccurate results. Finally, a simple analytical equation was developed to predict field capacity from soil hydraulic parameter information. The analytical equation was found to be effective in its ability to predict field capacities.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Neural Networks Prediction of Soil Hydraulic Functions for Alluvial Soils Using Multistep Outflow DataSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2004
- Flux-Based Estimation of Field CapacityJournal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999
- Refining the Definition of Field Capacity in the LiteratureJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 1998
- Closed‐Form Expressions for Water Retention and Conductivity DataGroundwater, 1997
- Automatic Atomized Water Spray System for Soil Hydraulic Conductivity MeasurementsSoil Science Society of America Journal, 1994
- Irrigation Scheduling Using Soil Moisture Measurements: Theory and Practice1982
- A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous mediaWater Resources Research, 1976
- SOME STEADY-STATE SOLUTIONS OF THE UNSATURATED MOISTURE FLOW EQUATION WITH APPLICATION TO EVAPORATION FROM A WATER TABLESoil Science, 1958
- The wilting coefficient for different plants : and its indirect determination /1912
- Moisture Equivalent Determinations and their ApplicationAgronomy Journal, 1910