Chimeric Fusion Proteins Used for Therapy: Indications, Mechanisms, and Safety
- 2 April 2015
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Drug Safety
- Vol. 38 (5) , 455-479
Abstract
Chimeric fusion proteins, produced by genetic engineering, are currently made up of effector peptides, for example, a ligand-binding portion of a cytokine or growth factor, extracellular domains of lymphocyte antigens, or a toxin linked to a suitable fusion partner. This review covers eight fusion proteins that have received regulatory approval for human therapy: etanercept, belatacept, abatacept, alefacept, rilonacept, romiplostim, aflibercept, and denileukin-diftitox. Important requirements for an effective fusion protein are effective targeting and binding, cytotoxicity, and a stable molecule with an extended half-life. The Fc region of human IgG1 is generally chosen as the fusion partner for the effector molecule(s) because it extends the fusion protein half-life by recycling via the salvage neonatal FcRn receptor and protects the molecule from lysosomal degradation. Each of the fusion proteins has IgG1 Fc as a fusion partner except denileukin-diftitox, which employs a modified diphtheria toxin effector peptide linked to interleukin-2. For six of the Fc fusion proteins, the effector peptide(s) is linked to the N-terminus of the Fc piece but for the thrombopoietin-mimetic romiplostim, linkage is through the C-terminus. Although some clear type I and IV hypersensitivities are known to be induced by fusion protein therapy, the pathomechanisms underlying many adverse hematologic, respiratory, renal, and cutaneous events have generally not been investigated. Assessment of immunogenicity risk is important because a number of immune-based, or influenced, adverse reactions such as anaphylaxis, cutaneous manifestations, infusion, and injection-site reactions, and cytokine release syndrome can occur. Features of many reactions, some autoimmune in nature, suggest type II, III, or IV hypersensitivities. Clinical findings with the anti-arthritis anti-psoriasis biologic etanercept provide the largest body of current knowledge of fusion protein-induced adverse events. For most fusion proteins, little information is available on appropriate diagnostic and desensitization procedures for hypersensitivity and other adverse responses, although skin test concentrations and some successful desensitization protocols have been published for etanercept.Keywords
This publication has 194 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fc‐fusion proteins: new developments and future perspectivesEMBO Molecular Medicine, 2012
- Competition for FcRn-mediated transport gives rise to short half-life of human IgG3 and offers therapeutic potentialNature Communications, 2011
- Angiokeratoma induced by injection of etanercept for psoriasisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2008
- Dependence of antibody-mediated presentation of antigen on FcRnProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- Alefacept (anti-CD2) causes a selective reduction in circulating effector memory T cells (Tem) and relative preservation of central memory T cells (Tcm) in psoriasisJournal of Translational Medicine, 2007
- Psoriasis after treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with etanerceptAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2006
- Transformed mycosis fungoides developing after treatment with alefaceptJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2005
- Rapid onset of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the penis in a patient with psoriasis on etanercept therapyJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2004
- A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating efficacy and tolerability of 2 courses of alefacept in patients with chronic plaque psoriasisJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2002
- EtanerceptDrugs, 1999