‘I felt so empowered, respected and shame free.’ Let’s test for HPV participants’ experience of HPV primary screening
Open Access
- 26 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by CSIRO Publishing in Journal of Primary Health Care
- Vol. 17 (2) , 134-145
Abstract
Introduction: Aotearoa New Zealand’s National Screening Unit (NSU) moved to use of human papillomavirus (HPV) primary screening in November 2023. Aims: This study aimed to evaluate participants’ views on favourable and unfavourable elements of HPV primary screening and to seek suggestions for potential improvements. Method: Primary care participants in a multi-region HPV primary screening implementation study were invited to complete an online follow-up survey in September 2023. This paper reports on qualitatively analysed responses to open-ended questions asking participants what they liked, disliked or thought could be improved for future screening participants. Results: Of 2361 invitations sent, 2302 were delivered, 969 people consented to participate and 921 were included in analyses (40%, 921/2302). Respondents were 24–71 years of age, from three regions, different ethnic groups and included under-screened participants. Most had chosen to self-test (92%) and 28.9% self-tested at home. Three quarters shared comments about what they liked, with themes related to ability to self-test, avoiding cervical tests, choice, communication and support. Twenty percent described unfavourable aspects, with themes related to inadequate information, self-testing issues, inappropriate physical space and process and programme-related factors. Seven key recommendations were identified from suggestions about potential improvements for future screening participants. Conclusion: Survey participants’ experience of HPV primary screening was overwhelmingly positive, with choice of a self-test a clear benefit for most. Inadequate information or communication contributed to suboptimal experiences for some. Participant recommendations highlight practical steps screen-takers (and the NSU) could take to ensure screening participants receive a well-informed, affirming experience that supports ongoing participation in cervical screening.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Otago (HOD fund)
- GRACI General Research Grant (COOC2301_07)
- Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand (Contract No. 374890/00)
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Offering HPV self-sampling kits: an updated meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies to increase participation in cervical cancer screeningBritish Journal of Cancer, 2022
- Determinants of routine cervical screening participation in underserved women: a qualitative systematic reviewPsychology & Health, 2022
- Worldwide use of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screeningPreventive Medicine, 2022
- Acceptability of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among never- and under-screened Indigenous and other minority women: a randomised three-arm community trial in Aotearoa New ZealandThe Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, 2021
- He Tapu Te Whare Tangata (sacred house of humanity): Under‐screened Māori women talk about HPV self‐testing cervical screening clinical pathwaysInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2021
- Emotional response to testing positive for human papillomavirus at cervical cancer screening: a mixed method systematic review with meta-analysisHealth Psychology Review, 2020
- HPV Self-sampling in Indigenous Communities: A Scoping ReviewJournal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 2019
- Factors associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) test acceptability in primary screening for cervical cancer: A mixed methods research synthesisPreventive Medicine, 2018
- Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general populationCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Experiences of cervical screening and barriers to participation in the context of an organised programme: a systematic review and thematic synthesisPsycho-Oncology, 2016