Accounting Factors and Spatio-Temporal Differences of the Carbon Footprint Factor in China’s Power System
Open Access
Abstract
The carbon footprint factor of a power system is a crucial basis for calculating carbon emissions from electricity consumption. However, the current carbon footprint factor of China’s power system faces several issues, such as a limited spatial range, outdated updates, an incomplete accounting scope, and unclear accounting methods. To make the power system’s carbon footprint accounting method and its temporal and spatial scope more comprehensive, this study reconstructs the accounting method based on the emission factor method, adding factors such as transmission losses, power transmission across spatial ranges, and Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas leakage. This study’s analysis reveals that these three accounting factors have a significant impact on the power system’s carbon footprint factor. In terms of the time dimension, the carbon footprint factor has decreased by more than 20% over the past 18 years, and when the time interval is refined to a monthly scale, the carbon footprint factor exhibits significant seasonal fluctuations. In the spatial dimension, the coefficient of variation (CV) for regional and provincial power system carbon footprint factors reached 27.38% and 29.98%, respectively, in 2022. For the same geographic location, the difference in carbon footprint factors between provincial and regional levels ranged from −73.98% to 119.95%. This study shows that the current carbon footprint factor of the power system has limitations, and there is an urgent need to improve the accounting factors, establish multi-level spatial division standards for provincial and regional scales, and shorten the update intervals while ensuring data timeliness. This will enhance the temporal and spatial accuracy of the carbon footprint factor, providing scientific support for precise carbon emission management.Keywords
Funding Information
- Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Program (2022YFHH0071)
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Importance of reducing GHG emissions in power transmission and distribution systemsEnergy Reports, 2024
- CO2 emission reduction effect of photovoltaic industry through 2060 in ChinaEnergy, 2023
- China’s coal power decarbonization via capture and storage and biomass co-firing: A LCA case study in Inner MongoliaEnergy, 2022
- VOC emissions of coal-fired power plants in China based on life cycle assessment methodFuel, 2021
- Assessing concurrent effects of climate change on hydropower supply, electricity demand, and greenhouse gas emissions in the Upper Yangtze River Basin of ChinaApplied Energy, 2020
- A comparative life-cycle assessment of hydro-, nuclear and wind power: A China studyApplied Energy, 2019
- Life cycle assessment and environmental cost accounting of coal-fired power generation in ChinaEnergy Policy, 2018
- Environmental effects of China's solar photovoltaic industry during 2011–2016: A life cycle assessment approachJournal of Cleaner Production, 2018
- Evaluating the economic impact of wind power development on local economies in ChinaEnergy Policy, 2017
- The substitution of wind power for coal-fired power to realize China's CO2 emissions reduction targets in 2020 and 2030Energy, 2017