Understanding Posttreatment Patient‐Provider Communication and Follow‐Up Care Among Self‐Identified Rural Cancer Survivors in Illinois
- 11 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Rural Health
- Vol. 36 (4) , 549-563
Abstract
Purpose: As disparities in rural‐urban cancer survivorship rates continue to widen, optimizing patient‐provider communication regarding timely follow‐up care is a potential mechanism to improving survivorship‐related outcomes. The current study examines sociodemographic and health predictors of posttreatment patient‐provider communication and follow‐up care and associations between written communication and timely follow‐up care for cancer survivors who identify as rural.Methods: Data were analyzed from posttreatment cancer survivor respondents of the Illinois Rural Cancer Assessment Study. The current study tested associations between sociodemographic variables and health factors on the quality of patient‐provider communication and timely posttreatment follow‐up care, defined as visits ≤ 3 months posttreatment, and associations between the receipt of written patient‐provider communication on timely posttreatment follow‐up care.Results: Among 90 self‐identified rural cancer survivors, respondents with annual incomes < $50,000 and ≤ High School diploma were more likely to report a high quality of posttreatment patient‐provider communication. Posttreatment written communication was reported by 62% of the respondents and 52% reported timely follow‐up visits during the first 3 years of posttreatment care. Patients who reported receiving written patient‐provider communication were more likely to have timely posttreatment follow‐up care after completing active treatment than patients who had not received written patient‐provider communication.Conclusions: Our findings suggest that written patient‐provider communication improved timely follow‐up care for self‐identified rural cancer survivors. This research supports policy and practice that recommend the receipt of written survivorship care plans. Implementation of written survivorship care recommendations has the potential to improve survivorship care for rural cancer survivors.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (K01CA193918)
- National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (U54MD012523)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survivorship Care Plans: Prevalence and Barriers to UseJournal of Cancer Education, 2013
- Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients living in urban and rural/regional areas: a systematic reviewSupportive Care in Cancer, 2011
- Socioeconomic, Rural-Urban, and Racial Inequalities in US Cancer Mortality: Part I—All Cancers and Lung Cancer and Part II—Colorectal, Prostate, Breast, and Cervical CancersJournal of Cancer Epidemiology, 2011
- Correlates and effect of suboptimal radiotherapy in women with ductal carcinoma in situ or early invasive breast cancerCancer, 2008
- Medical Care in Long-Term Survivors of Childhood Cancer: A Report From the Childhood Cancer Survivor StudyJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2008
- Influence of Patient-Provider Communication on Colorectal Cancer ScreeningMedical Care, 2008
- Perspectives on Post-Treatment Cancer Care: Qualitative Research With Survivors, Nurses, and PhysiciansJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Delay of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation following breast cancer surgery among elderly womenBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2006
- The self‐administered comorbidity questionnaire: A new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services researchArthritis Care & Research, 2003
- The Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale: an instrument for the evaluation of symptom prevalence, characteristics and distressEuropean Journal of Cancer, 1994