Quality of cancer care among foreign‐born and US‐born patients with lung or colorectal cancer
Authors:
- Signe Smith NielsenSigne Smith Nielsen
- John Z. AyanianJAJohn Z. Ayanian
- Nancy L. KeatingNKNancy L. Keating
Open Access
- 29 November 2010
- Vol. 116 (23) , 5497-5506
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Disparities in care have been documented for foreign‐born cancer patients in the United States. However, few data are available regarding patients with lung and colorectal cancer. In the current study, the authors assessed whether patient‐reported quality and receipt of recommended care differed between US‐born and foreign‐born cancer patients.METHODS: The authors collected surveys and medical records for a population‐based cohort including white, Hispanic, and Asian adults (2205 US‐born and 890 foreign‐born individuals) with lung or colorectal cancer diagnosed in California from 2003 through 2005. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between nativity and patient‐reported quality of care and receipt of recommended treatments (adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer, and curative surgery for stage I/II nonsmall cell lung cancer). The authors also assessed whether language explained any differences in care by nativity.RESULTS: Overall, 46% of patients reported excellent care, but foreign‐born patients were less likely than US‐born patients to report excellent quality of care (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.65‐1.00), a difference partly explained by the language of the survey, an indicator of English proficiency. Rates of recommended therapies ranged from 64% to 85%; foreign‐born patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (AOR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.12‐0.99). Rates of other treatments did not differ significantly by nativity.CONCLUSIONS: Foreign‐born cancer patients reported lower quality of care and were less likely to receive some cancer therapies than patients born in the Unites States. Better coordination of care and communication regarding cancer treatments and expanded use of interpreters may lessen these disparities. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patients' Experiences With Care for Lung Cancer and Colorectal Cancer: Findings From the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance ConsortiumJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2010
- Disparities in Breast Cancer Survival Among Asian Women by Ethnicity and Immigrant Status: A Population-Based StudyAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Use of Interpreters by Physicians Treating Limited English Proficient Women with Breast Cancer: Results from the Provider Survey of the Los Angeles Women's Health StudyHealth Services Research, 2010
- Influence of birthplace on breast cancer diagnosis and treatment for Hispanic womenBreast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2009
- Multiple imputation in a large-scale complex survey: a practical guideStatistical Methods in Medical Research, 2009
- Treatment and outcomes of gastric cancer among United States‐born and foreign‐born Asians and Pacific IslandersCancer, 2009
- Why do Asian-American women have lower rates of breast conserving surgery: results of a survey regarding physician perceptionsBMC Public Health, 2009
- Acculturation and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Older Latino Adults: Differential Associations by National OriginJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2009
- Survey Response Style and Differential Use of CAHPS Rating Scales by HispanicsMedical Care, 2008
- Do Professional Interpreters Improve Clinical Care for Patients with Limited English Proficiency? A Systematic Review of the LiteratureHealth Services Research, 2006