Is suction curettage an effective treatment alternative for cesarean scar pregnancies?
Authors:
- 1 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
- Vol. 258, 193-197
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy with Uterine Artery Embolization and Curettage as Compared to Transvaginal HysterotomyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2017
- Clinical classification and treatment of cesarean scar pregnancyJournal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 2017
- Uterine Artery Embolization Versus Methotrexate for Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in a Chinese Population: A Meta-analysisJournal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2016
- Surgical treatment of Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: efficacy and safety of ultrasound‐guided suction curettageUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2016
- Cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review of treatment studiesFertility and Sterility, 2016
- Suction curettage as first line treatment in cases with cesarean scar pregnancy: feasibility and effectiveness in early pregnancyThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 2015
- Evaluation of the transvaginal resection of low-segment cesarean scar ectopic pregnanciesFertility and Sterility, 2014
- Methotrexate therapy followed by suction curettage followed by Foley tamponade for caesarean scar pregnancyEuropean Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2011
- Caesarean section scar ectopic pregnancy: a new problem or new name for an old one?Australasian Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2009
- Pregnancy in a Cesarean scarUltrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2000