How Can Technology Improve Burn Wound Care: A Review of Wound Imaging Technologies and Their Application in Burns—UK Experience
Open Access
- 8 September 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (17) , 2277
Abstract
Burn wounds are complex injuries that require timely and accurate assessment to guide treatment decisions and improve healing outcomes. Traditional clinical evaluations are largely subjective, often leading to delays in intervention and increased risk of complications. Imaging technologies have emerged as valuable tools that enhance diagnostic accuracy and enable objective, real-time assessment of wound characteristics. This review aims to evaluate the range of imaging modalities currently applied in burn wound care and assess their clinical relevance, diagnostic accuracy, and cost-effectiveness. It explores how these technologies address key challenges in wound evaluation, particularly related to burn depth, perfusion status, bacterial burden, and healing potential. A comprehensive narrative review was conducted, drawing on peer-reviewed journal articles, NICE innovation briefings, and clinical trial data. The databases searched included PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Library. Imaging modalities examined include Laser Doppler Imaging (LDI), Fluorescence Imaging (FI), Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIR), Hyperspectral Imaging, Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI), and digital wound measurement systems. The clinical application and integration of these modalities in UK clinical practice were also explored. Each modality demonstrated unique clinical benefits. LDI was effective in assessing burn depth and perfusion, improving surgical planning, and reducing unnecessary procedures. FI, particularly the MolecuLight i:X device (MolecuLight Inc., Toronto, ON, Canada), accurately identified bacterial burden and guided targeted interventions. NIR and Hyperspectral Imaging provided insights into tissue oxygenation and viability, while SFDI enabled early detection of infection and vascular compromise. Digital measurement tools offered accurate, non-contact assessment and supported telemedicine use. NICE recognized both LDI and MolecuLight as valuable tools with the potential to improve outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Imaging technologies significantly improve the precision and efficiency of burn wound care. Their ability to offer objective, non-invasive diagnostics enhances clinical decision-making. Future research should focus on broader validation and integration into clinical guidelines to ensure widespread adoption.Keywords
This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial Frequency Domain Imaging (SFDI) of clinical burns: A case reportBurns Open, 2020
- Cost-effectiveness of silver dressings for paediatric partial thickness burns: An economic evaluation from a randomized controlled trialBurns, 2017
- Antimicrobial blue light inactivation ofPseudomonas aeruginosaby photo-excitation of endogenous porphyrins: In vitro and in vivo studiesLasers in Surgery and Medicine, 2016
- Characterization of burns using hyperspectral imaging technique – A preliminary studyBurns, 2015
- Noninvasive assessment of burn wound severity using optical technology: A review of current and future modalitiesBurns, 2011
- Laser Doppler imaging in a paediatric burns populationBurns, 2009
- Engineering adipose-like tissue in vitro and in vivo utilizing human bone marrow and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with silk fibroin 3D scaffoldsBiomaterials, 2007
- Burn depths evaluation based on active dynamic IR thermal imaging—A preliminary studyBurns, 2006
- Static thermography revisited—An adjunct method for determining the depth of the burn injuryBurns, 2005
- Thermographic assessment of hand burnsBurns, 1990