Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Indications and Outcomes from 2003 through 2013

Authors:
  • ESErin M. Schumer
    Erin M. Schumer
  • JCJohn H. Chaney
    John H. Chaney
  • JTJaimin R. Trivedi
    Jaimin R. Trivedi
  • PLPaul L. Linsky
    Paul L. Linsky
  • MWMatthew L. Williams
    Matthew L. Williams
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with increased in-hospital mortality rates and adverse events. This study retrospectively evaluated indications and outcomes in patients who underwent emergency CABG. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database for a single center (Jewish Hospital) was queried to identify patients undergoing isolated CABG. Univariate analysis was performed. From January 2003 through December 2013, 5,940 patients underwent CABG; 212 presented with emergency status. A high proportion of female patients (28.2%) underwent emergency surgery. Emergency CABG patients experienced high rates of intra-aortic balloon pump support, bleeding, dialysis, in-hospital death, and prolonged length of stay. The proportion of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting declined during years 2008–2013 compared with 2003–2007 (2.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001), but the incidence of angiographic accident (5.3% vs. 29.2%) increased as an indication. Ongoing ischemia remains the most frequent indication for emergency CABG, yet the incidence of angiographic accident has greatly increased. In-hospital mortality rates and adverse events remain high. If we look specifically at emergency CABG cases arising from angiographic accident, we find that 14 (15%) of all 93 emergency CABG deaths occurred in that subset of patients. Efforts to improve outcomes should therefore be focused on this high-risk group.

This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit: