Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in the Elderly: Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation
Authors:
- 18 January 2007
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 30 (s1) , S103-S107
Abstract
Background: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation is considered the treatment of choice for patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). This study examined the efficacy and safety of RF ablation in patients with AVNRT ≥65 years of age. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data collected in 350 consecutive patients who underwent AVNRT RF ablation between 1995 and 2005. They were divided according to whether they were Results: Patients in Group 2 more often had structural heart disease (12/70 vs 17/280, P = 0.002) than in Group 1, though there was no difference in the prevalence of syncope (6/70 vs 18/280, P = 0.52) or atrial fibrillation (1/70 vs 6/280, P = 0.70) between the 2 groups. Before RF ablation, patients in Group 2 had a longer mean A‐H intervals (90 ± 31 ms vs 77 ± 19 ms, P < 0.0001), H‐V intervals (44 ± 6 ms vs 41 ± 5 ms, P < 0.0001), fast pathway refractory period (358 ± 14 ms, vs 335 ± 68 ms, P = 0.01), and tachycardia cycle length (394 ± 71 ms vs. 335 ± 59 ms, P < 0.0001). A >140 ms A‐H interval was present in 3/70 patients in Group 2 versus 0/280 in Group 1 (P < 0.001). No difference was observed between the 2 groups in primary RF ablation success rate (70/70 vs 277/280, P = 0.38), overall procedure duration (75 ± 35 minute vs 78 ± 43 minute, P = 0.61), duration of fluoroscopic exposure (14 ± 12 minute vs 13 ± 12 minute, P = 0.63), or number of RF pulses (median 5 vs 4, P = 0.051). Two patients in Group 1 (0.57%) developed 3rd degree AV block requiring permanent pacing. Recurrences of AVNRT were limited to Group 1 (16/280 vs 0/70, P = 0.001). Conclusions: RF ablation of AVNRT was highly effective and safe in patients ≥65 years of age despite a higher prevalence of structural heart disease and longer A‐H intervals at baseline. RF ablation might be considered as first‐line therapy for the elderly with AVNRT.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-term safety and efficacy of slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia and pre-existing prolonged PR intervalEP Europace, 2006
- Efficacy and Safety of Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in the ElderlyJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2005
- Acute and Long‐Term Results of Slow Pathway Ablation in Patients with Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia—An Analysis of the Predictive Factors for Arrhythmia RecurrencePacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2005
- Risk of development of delayed atrioventricular block after slow pathway modification in patients with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia and a pre-existing prolonged PR intervalEuropean Heart Journal, 2001
- AV nodal re-entry tachycardia in elderly patientsCoronary Artery Disease, 1998
- Atrioventricular Node Reentry: Physiology and Radiofrequency AblationPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1997
- Prediction of Atrioventricular Block During Radiofrequency Ablation of the Slow Pathway of the Atrioventricular NodeCirculation, 1995
- Slow pathway ablation in patients with atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardia and a prolonged PR intervalJACC, 1994
- A simple technique for selective radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway in atrioventricular node reentrant tachycardiaJACC, 1993
- Treatment of Supraventricular Tachycardia Due to Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry by Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Slow-Pathway ConductionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1992