Patient–physician communication and health‐related quality of life of patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy – a longitudinal multilevel analysis
- 22 April 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in BJU International
- Vol. 119 (3) , 396-405
Abstract
Objectives: To examine whether patient–physician communication is associated with health‐related quality of life ( HRQ oL) in a sample of patients with localised prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy ( RP ). Patients and methods: HAROW (Hormonal therapy, Active Surveillance, Radiation, Operation, Watchful Waiting) is a prospective, observational study designed to collect data of the different treatment options for newly diagnosed patients with localised prostate cancer under real‐life conditions. At 6‐months intervals, clinical data (D'Amico risk categories, Charlson comorbidity index), aspects of patient–provider communication (standardised psychosocial‐care instrument for patients’ assessment of communication; Cologne Patient Questionnaire), and HRQ oL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) were assessed. Data were analysed by longitudinal multilevel analysis. Results: Completed questionnaires for 1772 patients undergoing a RP were analysed over a 3‐year follow‐up period. Patients rated the patient‐provider communication generally high with slight variations over the course of treatment (3.2–3.8). The HRQ oL of the patients varied substantial over time and between the reported subscales (global HRQ oL 71.1–77.2; physical functioning 89.1–92.1; role functioning 81.0–88.1; emotional functioning 74.4–84.0; cognitive functioning 84.3–87.7; social functioning (77.7–84.0). The longitudinal multilevel models showed significant associations between patient–provider communication in terms of devotion, support and shared decision‐making, and functional aspects of HRQ oL. Conclusion: Patient–provider communication is a valuable resource to support patients with prostate cancer coping with the disease and to improve their HRQ oL. Future interventions should be designed especially for urologists to enhance their awareness for the importance of communication and the relationship with their patients with prostate cancer for treatment outcomes.Keywords
Funding Information
- Stiftung Maennergesundheit
- GAZPROM Germania GmbH
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disease‐specific death and metastasis do not occur in patients with Gleason score ≤6 at radical prostatectomyBJU International, 2015
- Long-Term Follow-Up of a Large Active Surveillance Cohort of Patients With Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2015
- Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2014
- Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: Estimates for 40 countries in 2012European Journal of Cancer, 2013
- Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- The decision-related psychosocial concerns of men with localised prostate cancer: targets for intervention and researchWorld Journal of Urology, 2008
- A Nomogram Predicting 10-Year Life Expectancy in Candidates for Radical Prostatectomy or Radiotherapy for Prostate CancerJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- 13-Year Outcomes Following Treatment for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer in a Population Based CohortJournal of Urology, 2007
- Prospective study of men's psychological and decision-related adjustment after treatment for localized prostate cancerUrology, 2004
- The prevalence and predictors of psychological distress in patients with early localized prostate cancerBJU International, 2002