Bidirectional Intimate Partner Violence Among Service Members and Veterans: A Scoping Review
Open Access
- 16 January 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Trauma, Violence, & Abuse
Abstract
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health challenge with disproportionately high rates among United States (U.S.) Service Members and Veterans. IPV is often conceptualized as a unidirectional phenomenon despite evidence that most IPV is bidirectional, where both members of a couple use and experience IPV. This scoping review examined the current state of the literature on bidirectional IPV among Service Members and Veterans. MEDLINE, Embase, APA PsycInfo, APA PsyArticles, APA PsycExtra, CINAHL, CENTRAL, CDSR, Academic Search Premier, ERIC, Sociological Abstracts, PTSDpubs, ProQuest Dissertations & Abstracts, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched. Articles were selected based on the following inclusion criteria: (a) contains data on U.S. Service Members or Veterans over the age of 18; (b) measured IPV use (i.e., perpetration) and experience (i.e., victimization) during an overlapping period, and (c) reported bidirectional IPV at least once in either text, figures, or tables. Overall rates of bidirectional IPV across studies ( n = 21) ranged from 25% to 66.9%; rates disaggregated by subtype ranged from 1.5% (bidirectional sexual IPV) to 94% (bidirectional psychological IPV). There was considerable cross-study variation in measurement and operationalization. No studies contained data from both Service Members and Veterans in the same study. Higher rates of overall bidirectional IPV were documented among Veterans (range: 28.4%–66.9%) relative to Service Members (25%). These results highlight the need to collect data on the bidirectional IPV from Service Members and Veterans in the same study and consistent approaches to measuring and operationalizing bidirectional IPV.Keywords
Funding Information
- Office of Academic Affiliations, Department of Veterans Affairs
- Health Services Research and Development (CDA 19-234)
This publication has 49 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sex Differences in Intimate Partner Violence Lethality Risk Screening Administration and OutcomesJAMA Network Open, 2025
- Screening for Intimate Partner Violence Experience and Use in the Veterans Health AdministrationJAMA Network Open, 2023
- Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searchingResearch Synthesis Methods, 2022
- A Longitudinal Analysis of Women Veterans’ Partner Violence Perpetration: the Roles of Interpersonal Trauma and Posttraumatic Stress SymptomsJournal of Family Violence, 2019
- Modeling Risk for Intimate Partner Violence among Recent-Era Veteran-Partner DyadsJournal of Family Violence, 2017
- Current Controversies within Intimate Partner Violence: Overlooking Bidirectional ViolenceJournal of Family Violence, 2016
- Comparing Intimately Violent to Non-violent Veterans in Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress DisorderJournal of Family Violence, 2016
- Correlates of Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: Results From a National Epidemiologic SurveyJournal of Traumatic Stress, 2015
- Suicides in the Military: The Post-Modern Combat Veteran and the Hemingway EffectCurrent Psychiatry Reports, 2014
- A Dyadic Analysis of the Influence of Trauma Exposure and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Severity on Intimate Partner AggressionJournal of Traumatic Stress, 2013