Autoregressive With Exogenous Input (ARX) Decision Support for Blood Pressure Maintenance During Cesarean Delivery Under Spinal Anesthesia: A Prospective Pilot Study With Matched Nonconcurrent Controls
Preprint
Abstract
Background: Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery commonly causes maternal hypotension, which may compromise uteroplacental perfusion and maternal comfort. Guidelines recommend maintaining maternal blood pressure near baseline with prophylactic vasopressor strategies, yet titration remains reactive. We evaluated an autoregressive with exogenous input (ARX) decision-support algorithm that provides real-time forecasts of maternal mean arterial pressure (MAP) to support vasopressor management during cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Methods: In this single-center, open-label, prospective pilot study, 20 pregnant patients at term undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia received standard care supplemented by ARX-generated MAP predictions at 1-, 2- and 3-minute horizons. Clinicians titrated phenylephrine per institutional protocol while reviewing ARX predictions, retaining full autonomy for dosing decisions. Predictive performance was quantified using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), coefficient of determination (R²), and fraction of improvement in total error (FIT). ARX-guided patients were matched 1:2 to nonconcurrent controls (n = 40) on attending anesthesiologist and intrathecal bupivacaine dose, with nearest-neighbor matching on age and body mass index. Exploratory outcomes included hypotension (MAP Question: In pregnant patients at term undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, can a real-time ARX algorithm accurately forecast MAP and support vasopressor management? Findings: One-minute-ahead forecasts were accurate (RMSE 3.71 mmHg), and ARX-guided care was associated with a shorter duration of hypotension and a higher phenylephrine dose versus matched nonconcurrent controls Meaning: Real-time MAP forecasting is feasible and warrants randomized evaluation to confirm clinical benefit and characterize trade-offs.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Empirical pharmacodynamic model of phenylephrine and intrathecal bupivacaine for mean arterial pressure prediction in obstetric patients presenting for elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesiaJournal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2025
- Predicting intraoperative hypotension: from hope to hype and back to realityBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2023
- Selection of baseline blood pressure to guide management of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean sectionInternational Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, 2021
- Effect of a Machine Learning–Derived Early Warning System for Intraoperative Hypotension vs Standard Care on Depth and Duration of Intraoperative Hypotension During Elective Noncardiac SurgeryJAMA, 2020
- Machine-learning Algorithm to Predict Hypotension Based on High-fidelity Arterial Pressure Waveform AnalysisAnesthesiology, 2018
- Spinal-induced hypotension: Incidence, mechanisms, prophylaxis, and management: Summarizing 20 years of researchBest Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 2017
- Closed‐loop double‐vasopressor automated system vs manual bolus vasopressor to treat hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: a randomised controlled trialAnaesthesia, 2013
- Randomized comparison of closed-loop feedback computer-controlled with manual-controlled infusion of phenylephrine for maintaining arterial pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean deliveryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2012
- Hemodynamic Effects of Ephedrine, Phenylephrine, and the Coadministration of Phenylephrine with Oxytocin during Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesiology, 2009
- Placental Transfer and Fetal Metabolic Effects of Phenylephrine and Ephedrine during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesiology, 2009