Ultrashort (4-mm) Implants with Immediate Loading for Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation in Frail Patients of a Retrospective Cohort: A 10-Year Follow-Up
Authors:
- Gianluca BotticelliGianluca Botticelli
- Arianna ViarchiAVArianna Viarchi
- Davide GerardiDavide Gerardi
- Marco SeverinoMSMarco Severino
- Antonella MatteiAntonella Mattei
- Sofia RastelliSRSofia Rastelli
- Enrico IvagnesEIEnrico Ivagnes
- Alessandro RecchiaARAlessandro Recchia
- Rinaldi FabiolaRFRinaldi Fabiola
- Sara BernardiSara Bernardi
- Roberto GattoRGRoberto Gatto
- Giovanni FalisiGiovanni Falisi
Open Access
- 6 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Prosthesis
- Vol. 8 (8) , 83
Abstract
Background: The management of complete mandibular edentulism in frail patients with severe bone atrophy is a clinical challenge. Ultrashort implants (≤4 mm) have been proposed as a minimally invasive alternative to bone augmentation procedures; however, long-term evidence in full-arch rehabilitations remains limited. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study presents the 10-year follow-up of patients treated with full-arch mandibular rehabilitation under immediate loading supported by 4 mm ultrashort implants. Patients were originally treated between 2015 and 2017. The primary outcome was prosthetic success at 10 years, defined as a stable and functional prosthesis supported by four implants. Secondary outcomes included implant survival, timing of implant loss, and biological and prosthetic complications. Results: Fourteen patients were available for evaluation at the 10-year follow-up. The success of the prosthetic structure was 100%, with all patients maintaining stable and functional rehabilitation. As regards the implants, a total of 82 implants had been placed, with 14 implant losses, resulting in a cumulative implant survival rate of 82.9%. Implant losses occurred mainly in early (1 week, 4 months) and late phases (between 3 and 10 years), while no losses were observed between 1 and 3 years. Overall, 71.43% of patients experienced at least one implant loss; however, this did not compromise prosthetic function. Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort, all full-arch prostheses remained functional at 10 years, although cumulative implant survival was 82.9%. These findings suggest that rehabilitation supported by 4 mm ultrashort implants may represent a treatment option for carefully selected frail patients with severe mandibular atrophy. Prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings and compare this approach with standard-length implants and bone augmentation procedures.Keywords
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- How far can we go? A 20-year meta-analysis of dental implant survival ratesClinical Oral Investigations, 2024
- Biomechanical behavior analysis of four types of short implants with different placement depths using the finite element methodThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2023
- Are short implants (≤8.5 mm) reliable in the rehabilitation of completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysisThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2022
- Implant survival or implant success? Evaluation of implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in head and neck cancer patients—a prospective observational studyClinical Oral Investigations, 2019
- The All‐on‐4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow‐upClinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 2019
- Peri‐implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri‐Implant Diseases and ConditionsJournal of Periodontology, 2018
- Marginal bone loss as success criterion in implant dentistry: beyond 2 mmClinical Oral Implants Research, 2014
- A systematic review on marginal bone loss around short dental implants (<10 mm) for implant‐supported fixed prosthesesClinical Oral Implants Research, 2013
- Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro‐rough surface implants: a review of literature and meta‐analysisClinical Oral Implants Research, 2013
- Current status of the neutral zone: A literature reviewThe Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2013