Telemedicine for Evaluation of Retinopathy of Prematurity

Authors:
  • WFWalter M. Fierson
    Walter M. Fierson
  • ACAntonio Capone
    Antonio Capone
  • DGDavid B. Granet
    David B. Granet
  • RBRichard J. Blocker
    Richard J. Blocker
  • GBGeoffrey E. Bradford
    Geoffrey E. Bradford
  • FLFaap. Sharon S. Lehman
    Faap. Sharon S. Lehman
  • SRSteven E. Rubin
    Steven E. Rubin
  • RSR. Michael Siatkowski
    R. Michael Siatkowski
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This Technical Report was reaffirmed February 2021.: Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) remains a significant threat to vision for extremely premature infants despite the availability of therapeutic modalities capable, in most cases, of managing this disorder. It has been shown in many controlled trials that application of therapies at the appropriate time is essential to successful outcomes in premature infants affected by ROP. Bedside binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy has been the standard technique for diagnosis and monitoring of ROP in these patients. However, implementation of routine use of this screening method for at-risk premature infants has presented challenges within our existing care systems, including relative local scarcity of qualified ophthalmologist examiners in some locations and the remote location of some NICUs. Modern technology, including the development of wide-angle ocular digital fundus photography, coupled with the ability to send digital images electronically to remote locations, has led to the development of telemedicine-based remote digital fundus imaging (RDFI-TM) evaluation techniques. These techniques have the potential to allow the diagnosis and monitoring of ROP to occur in lieu of the necessity for some repeated on-site examinations in NICUs. This report reviews the currently available literature on RDFI-TM evaluations for ROP and outlines pertinent practical and risk management considerations that should be used when including RDFI-TM in any new or existing ROP care structure.

This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit: