Why Do We Need Research on Value Co-destruction?
Author:
- 14 September 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Creating Value
- Vol. 3 (2) , 162-169
Abstract
Because of the etymology of the word ‘value’, this article argues that value co-creation research and practice have been biased from their early days. Value co-destruction appears then as a concept that enables to keep some distance from this bias, and to have a better and more realistic understanding of value processes. More research on this topic is thus needed, especially in the rapidly growing context of ecosystems that make the analysis of value co-creation and value co-destruction even more complex. Finally, the article contends that research on co-destruction is a necessary, but not sufficient, step to depart from the etymological bias on value. To that end, it calls for a renewed value-related terminology to make it more encompassing, less biased and closer to real business life.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Every cloud has a silver lining — Exploring the dark side of value co-creation in B2B service networksIndustrial Marketing Management, 2016
- Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholdersJournal of Business Research, 2016
- Value co-destruction between customers and frontline employeesInternational Journal of Bank Marketing, 2015
- EditorialJournal of Creating Value, 2015
- An Exploration of Networks in Value Cocreation: A Service-Ecosystems View2012
- Service Systems as a Foundation for Resource Integration and Value Co-Creation2012
- Co-creation and co-destruction: A practice-theory based study of interactive value formationMarketing Theory, 2011
- Roles as resources: A social roles perspective of change in value networksMarketing Theory, 2011
- Value in business markets: What do we know? Where are we going?Industrial Marketing Management, 2005
- Consumer Value2002