Understanding how to build a social licence for using novel linked datasets for planning and research in Kent, Surrey and Sussex: results of deliberative focus groups.
Open Access
- 24 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Swansea University in International Journal of Population Data Science
- Vol. 5 (3) , 2114
Abstract
Introduction Digital programmes in the newly created NHS integrated care boards (ICBs) in the United Kingdom mean that curation and linkage of anonymised patient data is underway in many areas for the first time. In Kent, Surrey and Sussex (KSS), in Southeast England, public health teams want to use these datasets to answer strategic population health questions, but public expectations around use of patient data are unknown. Objectives We aimed to engage with citizens of KSS to gather their views and expectations of data linkage and re-use, through deliberative discussions. Methods We held five 3-hour deliberative focus groups with 79 citizens of KSS, presenting information about potential uses of data, safeguards, and mechanisms for public involvement in governance and decision making about datasets. After each presentation, participants discussed their views in facilitated small groups which were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. Results The focus groups generated 15 themes representing participants' views on the benefits, risks and values for safeguarding linked data. Participants largely supported use of patient data to improve health service efficiency and resource management, preventative services and out of hospital care, joined-up services and information flows. Most participants expressed concerns about data accuracy, breaches and hacking, and worried about commercial use of data. They suggested that transparency of data usage through audit trails and clear information about accountability, ensuring data re-use does not perpetuate stigma and discrimination, ongoing, inclusive and valued involvement of the public in dataset decision-making, and a commitment to building trust, would meet their expectations for responsible data use. Conclusions Participants were largely favourable about the proposed uses of patient linked datasets but expected a commitment to transparency and public involvement. Findings were mapped to previous tenets of social license and can be used to inform ICB digital programme teams on how to proceed with use of linked datasets in a trustworthy and socially acceptable way.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Should free-text data in electronic medical records be shared for research? A citizens’ jury study in the UKJournal of Medical Ethics, 2020
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidenceJournal of Medical Ethics, 2019
- Consensus Statement on Public Involvement and Engagement with Data-Intensive Health ResearchInternational Journal of Population Data Science, 2019
- Public responses to the sharing and linkage of health data for research purposes: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studiesBMC Medical Ethics, 2016
- Deliberative Discussion Focus GroupsQualitative Health Research, 2015
- The social licence for research: whycare.dataran into troubleJournal of Medical Ethics, 2015
- Attitudes of research participants and the general public towards genomic data sharing: a systematic literature reviewExpert Review of Molecular Diagnostics, 2014
- “Let’s get the best quality research we can”: public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative studyBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Patient Experiences and Attitudes about Access to a Patient Electronic Health Care Record and Linked Web MessagingJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2004
- Patient on-line access to medical records in general practice.1992