Right colectomy: consecutive 100 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique for malignancy. Cumulative experience in a single centre
- 17 November 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Updates in Surgery
- Vol. 71 (1) , 151-156
Abstract
Robotic-assisted resections prove beneficial in overcoming potential limitation of laparoscopy, but clear evidences on patient’s benefits are still lacking. We report our experience on 100 consecutive patients who underwent right colectomy with either robotic or laparoscopic approaches. Data were prospectively collected on a dedicated database (ASA score, age, operative time, conversion rate, re-operation rate, early complications, length of stay, and pathological results). Median total operative time was 160 min in LS group (IQR = 140–180) and 204 min for RS group (IQR = 180–230). Median time to first flatus was 2.5 days for LS group (IQR = 2 - 3) and 2 days for RS group (IQR = 1–2). Length of stay (median) was 8 days in LS group (IQR = 6–10) and 5 days in RS group (IQR = 5–7). No statistically significant difference was found between the 2 groups when the number of harvested nodes, the anastomotic leakage and the postoperative bleeding were analyzed. The 30-day mortality was 0% in LS and RS groups. Conversion rate for LS group was 14% (7/50 pts) and for RS group was 0% (0/50). Minimally invasive surgery is a feasible and safe technique. The RS may overcome some technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery and it achieves the same oncological results compared to LS but with higher costs. The lower conversion rate allows to expect better clinical outcomes and lower complication rate.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection of Colorectal Carcinoma: 3-Year Results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial GroupJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2007
- Laparoscopic-Assisted vs. Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer: A Prospective Randomized TrialJournal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques, 2004
- A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2003
- Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancerWorld Journal of Gastroenterology, 2003
- Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2002
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery For Colorectal CarcinomaSurgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques, 2002
- Short-term Quality-of-Life Outcomes Following Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy vs Open Colectomy for Colon CancerA Randomized TrialJAMA, 2002
- Acute phase response in laparoscopic and open colectomy in colon cancerDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2001
- Laparoscopic Resection Does Not Adversely Affect Early Survival Curves in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal AdenocarcinomaAnnals of Surgery, 1999