Dynamic Knee Stability and Movement Strategy During a Forward Lunge After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparison of Individuals With and Without Knee Pain
Authors:
- Mads Skipper SørensenMSMads Skipper Sørensen
- Jonas Schwarz LarsenJLJonas Schwarz Larsen
- Lauri StenrothLauri Stenroth
- Elisabeth BandakElisabeth Bandak
- Johannes Iuel BergJohannes Iuel Berg
- Kasper KrommesKasper Krommes
- Henning BliddalHenning Bliddal
- Per HölmichPer Hölmich
- Marius HenriksenMarius Henriksen
- Tine AlkjærTine Alkjær
- 1 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Human Kinetics in Journal of Applied Biomechanics
- Vol. -1 (aop) , 1-9
Abstract
Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and knee pain (symptomatic) have demonstrated reduced knee extensor strength and similar knee joint loading during a forward lunge (FL) as compared with those without pain (asymptomatic) 3–10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Still, the dynamic knee joint stability during FL may differ between the groups. This study examined dynamic knee stability, measured by knee wobble through 3D kinematic modeling, to explore if symptomatic individuals exhibit more mediolateral knee wobble than asymptomatic individuals. Additionally, kinematic and kinetic movement strategy differences between the groups were investigated. Musculoskeletal modeling of the FL was applied to quantify knee wobble and other biomechanical parameters. In total, 33 symptomatic and 89 asymptomatic participants were included. No significant difference in knee wobble was observed between groups (mean difference: −0.16 [95% CI, −0.61 to 0.29], P = .480). Overall, only negligible between-group movement pattern differences were observed, most notably, the symptomatic group exhibited less concentric knee work (mean difference: 0.16 J/kg [95% CI, 0.04 to 0.28], P = .012) compared to the asymptomatic group. These findings suggest that symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals exhibit similar dynamic knee stability and movement strategies during the FL, 3–10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Knee muscle strength and movement biomechanics in individuals with and without knee pain after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cross‐sectional studyKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2025
- Effects of exercise therapy on joint instability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic reviewOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2020
- Mechanoflammation in osteoarthritis pathogenesisSeminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, 2019
- Quadriceps Muscle Size Following ACL Injury and Reconstruction: A Systematic ReviewJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 2019
- American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstructionClinical Biomechanics, 2018
- Knee Extensor Strength and Risk of Structural, Symptomatic, and Functional Decline in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐AnalysisArthritis Care & Research, 2017
- Effect of skin movement artifact on knee kinematics during gait and cutting motions measured in vivoGait & Posture, 2006
- Tibiofemoral and tibiocalcaneal motion during walking: external vs. skeletal markersGait & Posture, 1997
- Relationship between lower limb dynamics and knee joint painJournal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991
- The effects of knee brace hinge design and placement on joint mechanicsJournal of Biomechanics, 1988