Explaining Enhanced Logical Consistency during Decision Making in Autism
Authors:
- Benedetto De MartinoBMBenedetto De Martino
- Neil A. HarrisonNHNeil A. Harrison
- Steven KnafoSKSteven Knafo
- Geoff BirdGBGeoff Bird
- Raymond J. DolanRDRaymond J. Dolan
Open Access
- 15 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Society for Neuroscience in The Journal of Neuroscience
- Vol. 28 (42) , 10746-10750
Abstract
The emotional responses elicited by the way options are framed often results in lack of logical consistency in human decision making. In this study, we investigated subjects with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) using a financial task in which the monetary prospects were presented as either loss or gain. We report both behavioral evidence that ASD subjects show a reduced susceptibility to the framing effect and psycho-physiological evidence that they fail to incorporate emotional context into the decision-making process. On this basis, we suggest that this insensitivity to contextual frame, although enhancing choice consistency in ASD, may also underpin core deficits in this disorder. These data highlight both benefits and costs arising from multiple decision processes in human cognition.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Power of the Positive: Revisiting Weak Coherence in Autism Spectrum DisordersQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2008
- Long story short: the serotonin transporter in emotion regulation and social cognitionNature Neuroscience, 2007
- Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendenciesTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007
- Frames, Biases, and Rational Decision-Making in the Human BrainScience, 2006
- AUTISM: A Window Onto the Development of the Social and the Analytic BrainAnnual Review of Neuroscience, 2005
- Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral EconomicsAmerican Economic Review, 2003
- The functional neuroanatomy of social behaviourBrain, 2000
- Autism: beyond “theory of mind”Cognition, 1994
- RISK PERCEPTION IN PSYCHOLOGY AND ECONOMICSEconomic Inquiry, 1982
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974