Ticagrelor or Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- 1 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 14 (7) , e010565
Abstract
Background: The comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been defined. Methods: This post hoc analysis included all patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with PCI and randomized to either ticagrelor or prasugrel in the ISAR-REACT 5 trial (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment). Complex PCI was defined as at least one of the following: multivessel PCI, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, and total stented length >60 mm. The primary efficacy end point was the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke; the safety end point was Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5 bleeding. Outcomes were assessed out to 12 months after randomization. Results: Among the 3377 patients treated with PCI in the ISAR-REACT 5 trial, 1429 underwent complex PCI (ticagrelor, N=696 and prasugrel, N=733) and 1948 underwent noncomplex PCI (ticagrelor, N=980 and prasugrel, N=968). There was no interaction between PCI complexity, assignment to either ticagrelor or prasugrel, and the primary efficacy or safety end points ( P for interaction: ≥0.13). In the complex PCI group, the primary efficacy end point (11.0% versus 9.2%, hazard ratio: 1.19 [0.85–1.66], P =0.303) and the safety end point (5.2% versus 6.1%, hazard ratio: 0.83 [0.53–1.31], P =0.419) were not statistically different in patients receiving either ticagrelor or prasugrel. In the noncomplex PCI group, the primary efficacy end point occurred more frequently in patients assigned to ticagrelor as compared to prasugrel (8.9% versus 5.5%, hazard ratio: 1.66 [1.18–2.34], P =0.004) without significant difference in terms of the safety end point (5.4% versus 4.1%, hazard ratio: 1.41 [0.92–2.17], P =0.110). Conclusions: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, PCI complexity does not influence the comparative efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and prasugrel. The observed comparable performance of ticagrelor and prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex PCI requires further confirmation. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT01944800.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration Based on Ischemic and Bleeding Risks After Coronary StentingJACC, 2019
- Evaluation of Microvascular Injury in Revascularized Patients With ST-Segment–Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Ticagrelor Versus PrasugrelCirculation, 2019
- Impact of lesion complexity on peri-procedural adverse events and the benefit of potent intravenous platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibition after percutaneous coronary intervention: core laboratory analysis from 10 854 patients from the CHAMPION PHOENIX trialEuropean Heart Journal, 2018
- Lesion Complexity and Outcomes of Extended Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJACC, 2017
- Prasugrel Versus Ticagrelor in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Percutaneous Coronary InterventionCirculation, 2016
- Efficacy and Safety of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Complex PCIJACC, 2016
- Randomized Comparison of Ticagrelor versus Prasugrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome and Planned Invasive Strategy—Design and Rationale of the Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (ISAR-REACT) 5 TrialJournal of Cardiovascular Translational Research, 2013
- Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel in patients with a planned invasive strategy for acute coronary syndromes (PLATO): a randomised double-blind studyThe Lancet, 2010
- Prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38): double-blind, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2009
- Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent TrialsCirculation, 2007