Characterization of Operator Learning Curve for Transradial Coronary Interventions
Authors:
- 1 August 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vol. 4 (4) , 336-341
Abstract
Background—: Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (TR-PCI) improves clinical outcomes compared to the transfemoral (TF) approach. However, inadequate training and experience has limited widespread adoption by interventional cardiologists. Methods and Results—: Clinical and procedural characteristics for TR-PCI were prospectively collected from 1999 to 2008. To identify minimum case volume for optimum clinical benefit, single-vessel TR-PCI cases were chronologically ranked and stratified into 1 to 50, 51 to 100, 101 to 150 and 151 to 300 case volume groups for operators starting the TR approach at the study institution. Cases by operators with a >300 TR-PCI case volume comprised the control group. TR-PCI failure rates, contrast use, guide usage, and fluoroscopy time were compared among groups. A total of 1672 patients underwent TR-PCI by 28 operators. TR-PCI failure occurred in 4% and was higher in the 1 to 50 case volume group compared to the 51 to 100 ( P =0.007) and control ( P =0.01) groups. Contrast use was greater in the 1 to 50 group (180±79 mL) compared to the 151 to 300 (157±75 mL, P =0.02) and control (168±79 mL, P =0.05) groups. Fluoroscopy time was higher in the 1 to 50 group (15±10 minutes) compared to the 101 to 150 (13±10 minutes, P =0.04) and control (12±9 minutes, P =0.02) groups. Reasons for TR-PCI failure included spasm (38%), subclavian tortuousity (16%), poor guide support (16%), failed access (10%), and radial loop (7%). Case volume was significantly correlated with TR-PCI failure (β=−0.0076, P =0.0028), and odds of failure was reduced by 32% for each 50 increments in case volume. Conclusions—: TR-PCI success depends on operator experience, and a case volume of ≥50 cases is required to achieve outcomes comparable to experienced operators. These findings have implications both for PCI operators looking to expand their skills and for defining standards for training.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trialsAmerican Heart Journal, 2009
- Predictors of outcome in patients undergoing PCI. Results of the RIVIERA studyInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2008
- Trends in the Prevalence and Outcomes of Radial and Femoral Approaches to Percutaneous Coronary InterventionJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2008
- Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenariansCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2007
- A Randomized Study Comparing Same-Day Home Discharge and Abciximab Bolus Only to Overnight Hospitalization and Abciximab Bolus and Infusion After Transradial Coronary Stent ImplantationCirculation, 2006
- Bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing early invasive management can be reduced with radial access, smaller sheath sizes, and timely sheath removalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2006
- Day case transradial coronary angioplasty: A four-year single-center experienceCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2006
- Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: a comparison of radial versus femoral access sitesJACC, 1998
- A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty by the Radial, Brachial and Femoral Approaches: The Access StudyJACC, 1997
- Cost comparison between two modes of palmaz schatz coronary stent implantation: Transradial bare stent technique vs. transfemoral sheath‐protected stent techniqueCatheterization and Cardiovascular Diagnosis, 1995