Relationships between sex and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute cardiogenic shock receiving mechanical circulatory support

This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:

• Myocardial infarction and COVID‑19 in a “non‑COVID” hospital: epidemiology, annual analysis
  EMERGENCY MEDICAL CARE, 2022
• Charlson Comorbidity Index: A Critical Review of Clinimetric Properties
  Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2022
• A Standardized and Comprehensive Approach to the Management of Cardiogenic Shock
  JACC: Heart Failure, 2020
• Gender Disparities in Presentation, Management, and Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction
  Current Cardiology Reports, 2018
• Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices for Acute Right Ventricular Failure
  Circulation, 2017
• 2015 SCAI/ACC/HFSA/STS Clinical Expert Consensus Statement on the Use of Percutaneous Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices in Cardiovascular Care
  JACC, 2015
• The Yentl syndrome is alive and well
  European Heart Journal, 2011
• Insights From the NHLBI-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) Study
  JACC, 2006
• Gender differences in management after acute myocardial infarction: not 'sexism' but a reflection of age at presentation
  Journal of Public Health, 2004
• Clinical Syndrome of Variant Angina with Normal Coronary Arteriogram
  New England Journal of Medicine, 1976