Video Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Initial Trauma Airway Management: Is There a Winner?
- 26 January 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Anesthesiology Reports
- Vol. 8 (1) , 78-85
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adult patients requiring tracheal intubationCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2016
- Defining the learning curve for endotracheal intubation using direct laryngoscopy: A systematic reviewResuscitation, 2016
- Comparison of Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy During Urgent Endotracheal IntubationCritical Care Medicine, 2015
- The Impact of Video Laryngoscopy Use During Urgent Endotracheal Intubation in the Critically IllAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2013
- Glidescope® video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysisCanadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie, 2011
- Out-of-theatre tracheal intubation: prospective multicentre study of clinical practice and adverse eventsBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2011
- The Success of Emergency Endotracheal Intubation in Trauma Patients: A 10-Year Experience at a Major Adult Trauma Referral CenterAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2009
- Endotracheal tube as a guide for an Eschmann gum elastic bougie to aid tracheal intubation using the McGrath® or GlideScope® videolaryngoscopesJournal of Clinical Anesthesia, 2008
- Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study*Critical Care Medicine, 2006
- Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic AttemptsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004