Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted imaging with synthetic b-values in breast tumors: comparison with dynamic contrast-enhanced and multiparametric MRI
Open Access
- 11 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in European Radiology
- Vol. 31 (1) , 356-367
Abstract
Objectives: To assess DWI for tumor visibility and breast cancer detection by the addition of different synthetic b-values.Methods: Eighty-four consecutive women who underwent a breast-multiparametric-MRI (mpMRI) with enhancing lesions on DCE-MRI (BI-RADS 2–5) were included in this IRB-approved retrospective study from September 2018 to March 2019. Three readers evaluated DW acquired b-800 and synthetic b-1000, b-1200, b-1500, and b-1800 s/mm2images for lesion visibility and preferred b-value based on lesion conspicuity. Image quality (1–3 scores) and breast composition (BI-RADS) were also recorded. Diagnostic parameters for DWI were determined using a 1–5 malignancy score based on qualitative imaging parameters (acquired + preferred synthetic b-values) and ADC values. BI-RADS classification was used for DCE-MRI and quantitative ADC values + BI-RADS were used for mpMRI.Results: Sixty-four malignant (average = 23 mm) and 39 benign (average = 8 mm) lesions were found in 80 women. Although b-800 achieved the best image quality score, synthetic b-values 1200–1500 s/mm2were preferred for lesion conspicuity, especially in dense breast. b-800 and synthetic b-1000/b-1200 s/mm2values allowed the visualization of 84–90% of cancers visible with DCE-MRI performing better than b-1500/b-1800 s/mm2. DWI was more specific (86.3% vs 65.7%,p< 0.001) but less sensitive (62.8% vs 90%,p< 0.001) and accurate (71% vs 80.7%,p= 0.003) than DCE-MRI for breast cancer detection, where mpMRI was the most accurate modality accounting for less false positive cases.Conclusion: The addition of synthetic b-values enhances tumor conspicuity and could potentially improve tumor visualization particularly in dense breast. However, its supportive role for DWI breast cancer detection is still not definite.Key Points: •The addition of synthetic b-values (1200–1500 s/mm2) to acquired DWI afforded a better lesion conspicuity without increasing acquisition time and was particularly useful in dense breasts.•Despite the use of synthetic b-values, DWI was less sensitive and accurate than DCE-MRI for breast cancer detection.•A multiparametric MRI modality still remains the best approach having the highest accuracy for breast cancer detection and thus reducing the number of unnecessary biopsies.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748)
- Breast Cancer Research Foundation (NA)
- Susan G. Komen (NA)
- Fundación Alfonso Martín Escudero (NA)
- European School of Radiology (NA)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quantitative Evaluation of Computed High b Value Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the ProstateInvestigative Radiology, 2013
- Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the prostate: Comparison of b1000 and b2000 image sets for index lesion detectionJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2013
- Conspicuity of breast lesions at different b values on diffusion-weighted imagingBMC Cancer, 2012
- Computed Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging May Improve Tumor DetectionRadiology, 2011
- Meta-analysis of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of breast lesionsBMC Cancer, 2010
- Diffusion-weighted Imaging Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Conventional 3.0-T Breast MR ImagingRadiology, 2010
- Differential diagnosis of mammographically and clinically occult breast lesions on diffusion‐weighted MRIJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 2010
- Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging as an Adjunct to Conventional Breast MRI for Improved Positive Predictive ValueAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2009
- Sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced MR mammography (DWI combined with T2-weighted TSE imaging, ueMRM) for the differentiation of mass lesionsEuropean Radiology, 2009
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Cerebral Infarctions: Are Higher b Values Better?Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 2002