64. The logic, methodological and practical flaws of the harm-benefit-analysis in Directive 2010/63/EU
Authors:
- 13 June 2018
- conference paper
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- p. 407-411
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- White Paper and Colourful Language: Toward a Realistic View of Animal ResearchAlternatives to Laboratory Animals, 2017
- Recommendations for Addressing Harm–Benefit Analysis and Implementation in Ethical Evaluation – Report from the AALAS–FELASA Working Group on Harm–Benefit Analysis – Part 2Laboratory Animals, 2016
- Current concepts of Harm–Benefit Analysis of Animal Experiments – Report from the AALAS–FELASA Working Group on Harm–Benefit Analysis – Part 1Laboratory Animals, 2016
- The Heroes of CRISPRCell, 2016
- From Scientific Discovery to Cures: Bright Stars within a GalaxyCell, 2015
- Evaluating the ethical acceptability of animal researchLab Animal, 2014
- Market withdrawal of new molecular entities approved in the United States from 1980 to 2009Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- Study Affirms Pharma's Influence on PhysiciansJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Rare diseases and orphan drugsBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2006
- Bromfenac(Duract)-Associated Hepatic Failure Requiring Liver TransplantationAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 1999