Priorities for improving paediatric diagnosis: findings from a modified Delphi study
- 26 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in BMJ Quality & Safety
Abstract
Background Efforts to improve diagnosis should reflect the unique needs of children; however, there is no consensus on paediatric-specific priority areas. Methods An expert panel of 25 United States (US) paediatric diagnostic excellence researchers, patient safety leaders and family partners from 15 institutions participated in a modified Delphi panel. Panellists participated in generating a literature-derived list of topics relevant to improving diagnosis. Panellists then rated agreement on each topic as a research or operational improvement priority. Topics that achieved consensus (≥75% of panellists rating them as high priority) were subsequently rated based on feasibility for implementation at the respondent’s institution. Results Literature review identified 24 topics relevant to paediatric diagnostic safety and quality, which were expanded to 62 topics during the initial panel discussion and grouped into 25 survey topics. Consensus was reached on 6 topics as research priorities and 11 as operational improvement priorities. Of these, three were deemed highly feasible for research and three for operational improvement. Research priorities included: identifying paediatric conditions at high risk for diagnostic error, developing communication methods to enhance the diagnostic process and establishing diagnostic process feedback mechanisms. Operational improvement priorities included: identifying care delivery or health services scenarios at high risk for diagnostic error, establishing interdisciplinary, structured review of cases of diagnostic error and encouraging reporting of missed opportunities for improving diagnostic safety. Conclusion Experts successfully prioritised important and feasible topics in research and practice for improving paediatric diagnosis in US academic medical centres.Keywords
Funding Information
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation (n/a)
- Houston Veterans Administration Health Systems Research and Development Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety (CIN13-413)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Contract # 75Q80120D00020/75Q80123F32003)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K08HS028682)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS028595)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R01HS029318)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS029346)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (R18HS029347)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (n/a Clinical Futures Pilot Award)
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emergency Department Volume and Delayed Diagnosis of Serious Pediatric ConditionsJAMA Pediatrics, 2024
- Opportunities to improve diagnosis in emergency transfers to the pediatric intensive care unitJournal of Hospital Medicine, 2023
- Association Between Hospital-Acquired Harm Outcomes and Membership in a National Patient Safety CollaborativeJAMA Pediatrics, 2022
- Creating a Learning Health System for Improving Diagnostic Safety: Pragmatic Insights from US Health Care OrganizationsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2022
- Advancing Diagnostic Safety Research: Results of a Systematic Research Priority Setting ExerciseJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2021
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partnersJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2019
- Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De‐implementation in Public Health and Social Service SettingsAmerican Journal of Community Psychology, 2018
- Accuracy of the Safer Dx Instrument to Identify Diagnostic Errors in Primary CareJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2016
- Pediatric Collaborative Networks for Quality Improvement and ResearchAcademic Pediatrics, 2013
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009