Peer review should be conducted by a peer—Health Promotion International’s position on the use of GenAI for peer review
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Health Promotion International
- Vol. 41 (5)
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- AI in peer review: the elephant in the editorial roomEvidence-Based Dentistry, 2026
- Artificial intelligence in scholarly peer review: a scoping review of applications, risks, and governance challengesInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2026
- A large-scale randomized study of large language model feedback in peer reviewNature Machine Intelligence, 2026
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) guidance for authors, peer reviewers, and editors: A content analysis of journal policiesAccountability in Research, 2026
- More than half of researchers now use AI for peer review — often against guidanceNature, 2025
- The peer-review crisis: how to fix an overloaded systemNature, 2025
- Tracking the carbon footprint of global generative artificial intelligenceThe Innovation, 2025
- Exploring the Impact of Generative AI on Peer Review: Insights from Journal ReviewersJournal of Academic Ethics, 2025
- A call for civility in peer reviewSleep Health, 2024
- Peer review perpetuates barriers for historically excluded groupsNature Ecology & Evolution, 2023