Musical Sound Quality Perception of Low‐Frequency Degradation Across Hearing‐Assistive Devices
- 26 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in The Laryngoscope
Abstract
Objectives: To compare low‐frequency‐degraded musical sound quality perception between users of different hearing‐assistive devices. Methods: Fifty‐two adults including 11 normal‐hearing (NH) listeners, eight bilateral hearing aid users (HAHA), 17 bimodal users (CIHA), and 16 bilateral cochlear implant users (CICI) were recruited for a cross‐sectional observational study. Participants assessed the sound quality of 3‐s‐long musical segments (15 sets) using the CI‐Multiple Stimulus with Hidden Reference and Anchor test. Subjects rated and ranked a hidden Reference (“best”); three high‐pass filtered (HPF) versions with low‐frequency cutoffs at 200, 400, and 800 Hz; and an anchor (most degraded version). ART ANOVA with post hoc comparisons was conducted to identify between‐group differences in average perceived sound quality ratings for each stimulus version. Results: Both cohort and degree of low‐frequency degradation had significant effects and interaction on sound quality perception ( p < 0.001). HAHA users rated sound quality higher than both CIHA and CICI users for the 200 and 400 Hz HPF conditions ( p < 0.001), while CIHA and CICI performed similarly. No difference was seen at 800 Hz HPF, suggesting all three hearing‐impaired groups were similarly affected when low‐frequency degradation was severe. Additionally, HAHA, CIHA, and CICI all had difficulty identifying the Reference and correctly ordering stimuli compared to NH. Conclusion: HAHA users exhibit superior sensitivity to low‐frequency sound degradation (≤ 400 Hz) than CI users. These findings elucidate low‐frequency perception limitations as a contributing factor to diminished CI‐mediated musical sound quality and provide evidence for preoperative counseling of implant candidates regarding their postoperative music‐listening experience. Level of Evidence: 3.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hearing Aids: What Works Well and What Can Be ImprovedJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2026
- Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement and Music PerceptionJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2025
- An overview of factors affecting bimodal and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) speech understanding outcomesHearing Research, 2023
- Self-reported music perception is related to quality of life and self-reported hearing abilities in cochlear implant usersCochlear Implants International, 2021
- Assessment of Speech Understanding After Cochlear Implantation in Adult Hearing Aid UsersJAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 2020
- Cochlear Implantation in AdultsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Temporal and spectral contributions to musical instrument identification and discrimination among cochlear implant usersWorld Journal of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2016
- Technological, biological, and acoustical constraints to music perception in cochlear implant usersHearing Research, 2014
- Temporal and Spectral Cues for Musical Timbre Perception in Electric HearingJournal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2011
- A comparison of the speech recognition and pitch ranking abilities of children using a unilateral cochlear implant, bimodal stimulation or bilateral hearing aidsInternational Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 2011