Integrated Exhaled VOC and Clinical Biomarker Profiling for Predicting Bronchodilator Responsiveness in Asthma and COPD Patients
Authors:
- Malika MustafinaMMMalika Mustafina
- Artemiy SilantyevASArtemiy Silantyev
- Aleksander SuvorovASAleksander Suvorov
- Alexander ChernyakACAlexander Chernyak
- Olga SuvorovaOSOlga Suvorova
- Anna ShmidtASAnna Shmidt
- Anastasia GordeevaAGAnastasia Gordeeva
- Maria VergunMVMaria Vergun
- Daria GognievaDGDaria Gognieva
- Sergey AvdeevSASergey Avdeev
- Vladimir BetelinVBVladimir Betelin
- Philipp KopylovPhilipp Kopylov
Open Access
- 28 October 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 15 (21) , 2738
Abstract
Background: Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are prevalent obstructive lung diseases with distinct inflammatory pathways but overlapping clinical features. Bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) is a key diagnostic criterion, yet its metabolic determinants are poorly understood. Objective: This cross-sectional study investigated whether integrated profiling of exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and clinical biomarkers can differentiate BA, COPD, and health, and predict BDR. Methods: Exhaled breath from 160 BA patients, 128 COPD patients, and 254 healthy controls was analyzed in real-time using proton-transfer reaction time-of-flight mass spectrometry (PTR-TOF-MS) during tidal and forced expiration. Clinical assessment included spirometry, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), blood eosinophil count, and total IgE. Machine-learning (XGBoost) was employed for feature selection and model development. Results: Distinct VOC signatures effectively discriminated disease groups from controls and from each other. The model for distinguishing asthma from healthy controls achieved an AUC of 0.747 during normal quiet breathing and 0.710 during forced exhale. For discriminating COPD from healthy controls, the model performance was higher, with an AUC of 0.821 for normal quiet breathing and 0.856 for forced exhale. A model integrating VOC profiles with clinical biomarkers (FeNO, eosinophils, IgE) demonstrated very high accuracy in internal validation in predicting BDR (AUC = 1.000 for tidal breathing; AUC = 0.970 for forced expiration). Specific mass spectral features (m/z 79, m/z 101) were significantly associated with a positive BDR test. Conclusions: This study delineates disease-specific VOC signatures and underscores the profound synergy between exhaled metabolomics and clinical immunology for identifying associations treatment response, advocating for the integration of real-time breath analysis into personalized management strategies for obstructive lung diseases.Keywords
Funding Information
- Russian Science Foundation (24-15-00549)
- Government assignment (1023022600020-6)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Exhaled breath analysis for the discrimination of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseJournal of Breath Research, 2024
- Exhaled breath analysis in adult patients with cystic fibrosis by real-time proton mass spectrometryClinica Chimica Acta, 2024
- Ultrafast gas chromatography coupled to electronic nose to identify volatile biomarkers in exhaled breath from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: A pilot studyBiomedical Chromatography, 2019
- Cluster analysis on breath print of newly diagnosed COPD patients: effects of therapyJournal of Breath Research, 2018
- Development/verification of methods for measurement of exhaled breath and environmental e-vapor product aerosolRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2017
- Blood eosinophil count and prospective annual asthma disease burden: a UK cohort studyThe Lancet Respiratory Medicine, 2015
- The Asthma–COPD Overlap SyndromeNew England Journal of Medicine, 2015
- Profiling allergic asthma volatile metabolic patterns using a headspace-solid phase microextraction/gas chromatography based methodologyJournal of Chromatography A, 2011
- Compounds enhanced in a mass spectrometric profile of smokers' exhaled breath versus non-smokers as determined in a pilot study using PTR-MSJournal of Breath Research, 2008
- An electronic nose in the discrimination of patients with asthma and controlsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2007