MAGGIC risk score-based risk stratification for selecting patients with heart failure who will benefit from multidisciplinary care
Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Open Heart
- Vol. 12 (2) , e003496
Abstract
Objective: Guidelines worldwide recommend specialist outpatient clinics staffed by a multidisciplinary team for management of patients with heart failure (HF). However, there is limited information on how best to select these patients for efficient use of resources. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of team-based care for patients with HF after discharge from hospital according to duration of intervention and stratification of patients according to risk. Methods: We retrospectively identified 185 eligible patients who were hospitalised with acute decompensated HF at our institution between January 2021 and June 2023. Multidisciplinary team care was defined as outpatient follow-up by both cardiologists and nurses postdischarge. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular-related death and readmission with HF within 1 year, which was compared between patients receiving HF team care and those receiving standard follow-up. Results: HF team care was provided for 53.0% of patients, who were younger than those receiving standard follow-up and required more oral inotropes, tolvaptan and amiodarone. Among those receiving HF team care, the majority (58.2%) had an intervention duration of 30 days or less after discharge. After adjusting for background differences by inverse probability of treatment weighting, HF team care was associated with favourable 180-day outcomes, but there was no significant between-group difference in the 1-year primary outcomes. In subgroup analysis, patients with a higher Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure score (≥28), indicating a higher risk of exacerbation of HF, had significantly lower 1-year event rates with HF team care (p value for interaction <0.05). Conclusions: Multidisciplinary HF team care is most effective for patients at higher risk of exacerbation of HF. A risk score model may optimise patient selection for specialised care.Keywords
Funding Information
- JSPS KAKENHI (20K08403)
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- JCS/JHFS 2025 Guideline on Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart FailureJournal of Cardiac Failure, 2025
- Trial of an Intervention to Improve Acute Heart Failure OutcomesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2023
- A Comparison Between Hospital Follow-Up and Collaborative Follow-Up in Patients with Acute Heart FailureESC Heart Failure, 2022
- 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failureEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2022
- The effectiveness of transitional care interventions for adult people with heart failure on patient-centered health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis including dose-response relationshipInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2021
- The Effectiveness of Transitional Care Interventions on Health Care Utilization in Patients Discharged From the Hospital With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2021
- The MAGGIC risk score predicts mortality in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: sub-analysis of the OCEAN-TAVI registryHeart and Vessels, 2019
- Performance of the MAGGIC Heart Failure Risk Score and its Modification with the Addition of Discharge Natriuretic PeptidesESC Heart Failure, 2018
- Comparative Effectiveness of Transitional Care Services in Patients Discharged from the Hospital with Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-AnalysisEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2017
- Effect of Extended Follow-Up in a Specialized Heart Failure Clinic on Adherence to Guideline Recommended Therapy: NorthStar Adherence StudyEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2014