Exploring Optimal Stimulus Frequency Ratio for Measurement of the Quadratic f 2 –f 1 Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emission in Humans
- 13 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Speech Language Hearing Association in Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
- Vol. 61 (7) , 1794-1806
Abstract
Purpose: Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) are a by-product of active cochlear processes that lead to the compressive nonlinearity of healthy ears. The most commonly studied emission is at the frequency 2f 1 –f 2 , but there has been recent interest in using the quadratic distortion product at the frequency f 2 –f 1 to detect cochleopathies including endolymphatic hydrops. Before the DPOAE at f 2 –f 1 can be applied clinically in any capacity, optimal stimulus parameters for its elicitation must be established. Method: We investigated stimulus parameters for the DPOAEs at f 2 –f 1 and 2f 1 –f 2 in 23 adults with normal hearing. Logarithmically swept tones between approximately 0.6 and 20 kHz (L 1 = L 2 = 70 dB SPL) served as the higher frequency stimulus (f 2 ). DPOAEs were measured for 6 f 2 /f 1 ratios: 1.14, 1.18, 1.22, 1.30, 1.32, and 1.36. Results: Both DPOAEs were consistently measurable. In line with previous investigations, the highest levels of the DPOAE at 2f 1 –f 2 were generated between f 2 /f 1 ratios of 1.14–1.22, with a peak in the level ratio function at 1.22. In contrast, f 2 –f 1 was less influenced by ratio, although the narrowest ratio (1.14) produced slightly higher levels across frequency. Conclusion: The DPOAE at f 2 –f 1 is measurable in individuals with normal hearing up to f 2 of 20 kHz at narrow f 2 /f 1 ratios. Measurements at additional stimulus levels and in subjects with hearing impairment will be needed before clinical implementation.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Behavioral Hearing Thresholds Between 0.125 and 20 kHz Using Depth-Compensated Ear Simulator CalibrationEar & Hearing, 2012
- Maturation and Aging of the Human Cochlea: A View through the DPOAE Looking GlassJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2012
- Comparing the optimal signal conditions for recording cubic and quadratic distortion product otoacoustic emissionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2008
- Determining the Cause of Hearing Loss: Differential Diagnosis Using a Comparison of Audiometric and Otoacoustic Emission ResponsesEar & Hearing, 2006
- Distortion product otoacoustic emission (2 f1−f2) amplitude as a function of f2/f1 frequency ratio and primary tone level separation in human adults and neonatesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1996
- The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissionsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1995
- Acoustic distortion products in humans: Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of f2/f1 ratioThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1989
- Perception of the simple difference tone (f2−f1)The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1979
- Audibility Region of Combination TonesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1972
- Auditory NonlinearityThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1967