Comparison between patient-specific deep brain stimulation simulations and commercial system SureTune3

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Objective. Software to visualize estimated volume of tissue activated (VTA) in deep brain stimulation assuming a homogeneous tissue surrounding such as SureTune3 has recently become available for clinical use. The objective of this study is to compare SureTune3 with homogeneous and heterogeneous patient-specific finite element method (FEM) simulations of the VTA to elucidate how well they coincide in their estimates. Approach. FEM simulations of the VTA were performed in COMSOL Multiphysics and compared with VTA from SureTune3 with variation of voltage and current amplitude, pulse width, axon diameter, number of active contacts, and surrounding homogeneous grey or white matter. Patient-specific simulations with heterogeneous tissue were also performed. Main results. The VTAs corresponded well for voltage control in homogeneous tissue, though with the smallest VTAs being slightly larger in SureTune3 and the largest VTAs being slightly larger in the FEM simulations. In current control, FEM estimated larger VTAs in white matter and smaller VTAs in grey matter compared to SureTune3 as grey matter has higher electric conductivity than white matter and requires less voltage to reach the same current. The VTAs also corresponded well in the patient-specific cases except for one case with a cyst of highly conductive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) near the active contacts. Significance. The VTA estimates without taking the surrounding tissue into account in SureTune3 are in good agreement with patient-specific FEM simulations when using voltage control in the absence of CSF-filled cyst. In current control or when CSF is present near the active contacts, the tissue characteristics are important for the VTA and needs consideration. Clinical. trial ethical approval: Local ethics committee at Linköping University (2012/434-31).
Funding Information
  • Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (BD15-0032)
  • ALF Grants Region Östergötland (LIO-698041)
  • Swedish Research Council (2016-03564)

This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit: