Comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomic Burch colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence
Open Access
- 18 August 2025
- journal article
- Published by Galenos Yayinevi in Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association
- Vol. 26 (3) , 190-194
Abstract
Comparison of laparoscopic and laparotomic Burch colposuspension in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence - Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological AssociationKeywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic and open Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence: Advantages / disadvantagesJournal of Population Therapeutics and Clinical Pharmacology, 2022
- The Development of Laparoscopy—A Historical OverviewFrontiers in Surgery, 2021
- Validation of the Turkish version of the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire in patients with chronic painJournal of International Medical Research, 2021
- Identification of the Urogenital Distress Inventory-6 and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire-7 cutoff scores in urinary incontinent womenHealth and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2021
- Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysisAging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2020
- Burch colposuspensionNeurourology and Urodynamics, 2019
- Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Open retropubic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in womenCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017
- Urinary incontinence in womenNature Reviews Disease Primers, 2017
- Laparoscopic versus open Burch colposuspension: a randomised controlled trialBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 2006