Interpretative commenting: A tool for improving the laboratory–clinical interface
Author:
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinica Chimica Acta
- Vol. 404 (1) , 46-51
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Clinical Practice: Quality Requirements1Clinical Chemistry, 2008
- Evaluating laboratory diagnostic testsBMJ, 2008
- Genetic tests for common diseases: new insights, old concernsBMJ, 2008
- The frequency of missed test results and associated treatment delays in a highly computerized health systemBMC Family Practice, 2007
- Quality specifications: self pleasure for clinical laboratories or added value for patient management?Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), 2007
- Stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive markers to diagnose significant fibrosis in chronic hepatitis CJournal of Hepatology, 2006
- The Growth Of Physician Medical Malpractice Payments: Evidence From The National Practitioner Data BankHealth Affairs, 2005
- Consensus guidelines on anti-cardiolipin antibody testing and reportingPathology, 2004
- A discussion of cases in the 2001 RCPA-AQAP Chemical Pathology Case Report Comments ProgramPathology, 2003
- Atrophic Gastritis Serum Levels of Amidated Gastrin-17 and Pepsinogen I in Atrophic Gastritis: An Observational Case-Control StudyScandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 2002