The robustness of seismic moment and magnitudes estimated using spectral analysis
Open Access
- 23 May 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Geophysical Prospecting
- Vol. 62 (4) , 862-878
Abstract
We present an assessment of how microseismic moment magnitude, , estimates vary with the method and parameters used to calculate seismic moment. This is an important topic for operators and regulators who require good magnitude estimates when monitoring induced seismicity. It is therefore imperative that these parties know and understand what errors exist in given magnitude values, something that is poorly reported. This study concentrates on spectral analysis techniques and compares computed in the time and frequency domains. Using recordings of events at Cotton Valley, east Texas, the maximum discrepancy between estimated using the different methods is 0.6 units, a significant variation. By adjusting parameters in the calculation we find that the radiation pattern correction term can have the most significant effect on , generally up to 0.8 units. Following this investigation we make a series of recommendations for estimating microseismic using spectral methods. Noise should be estimated and removed from recordings and an attenuation correction should be applied. The spectral level can be measured by spectral fitting or taken from the low frequency level. Significant factors in obtaining reliable microseismic estimates include using at least four receivers recording at ⩾1000 Hz and making radiation pattern corrections based on focal mechanism solutions, not average values.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Source Parameters of Picoseismicity Recorded at Mponeng Deep Gold Mine, South Africa: Implications for Scaling RelationsBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011
- Scaling Relations of Local Magnitude versus Moment Magnitude for Sequences of Similar Earthquakes in SwitzerlandBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2011
- An Evaluation of the SCSN Moment Tensor Solutions: Robustness of the Mw Magnitude Scale, Style of Faulting, and Automation of the MethodBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006
- Variations in earthquake-size distribution across different stress regimesNature, 2005
- Source Parameters and Scaling Relations for Mining-Related Seismicity within the Pyhasalmi Ore Mine, FinlandBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005
- Source Parameter Scaling for Small Earthquakes Observed at the Western Nagano 800-m-Deep Borehole, Central JapanBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004
- Faulting Induced by Forced Fluid Injection and Fluid Flow Forced by Faulting: An Interpretation of Hydraulic-Fracture Microseismicity, Carthage Cotton Valley Gas Field, TexasBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2004
- Apparent break in earthquake scaling due to path and site effects on deep borehole recordingsJournal of Geophysical Research, 2003
- Observations of Earthquake Source Parameters at 2 km Depth in the Long Valley Caldera, Eastern CaliforniaBulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2001
- Earthquake source scaling relationships from −1 to 5 ML using seismograms recorded at 2.5‐km depthJournal of Geophysical Research, 1995