PDOSPERT: A New Scale to Predict Domain‐Specific Risk‐Taking Behaviors in Times of a Pandemic
Open Access
- 2 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Behavioral Decision Making
- Vol. 37 (4)
Abstract
Understanding risk tolerance is crucial for predicting and changing behavior across various domains, including health and safety, finance, and ethics. This remains true during a crisis, such as the COVID‐19 pandemic, and leads to a key question: Do current risk measures reliably predict risk‐taking in the drastically different context of a pandemic? The Domain Specific Risk‐Taking (DOSPERT) scale, one of the most widely used risk‐taking measures, assesses self‐reported risk‐taking in response to 30 risky situations across five domains. With the hypothetical risks of the DOSPERT being based on prepandemic circumstances, we estimate that three out of four of its risk‐taking situations were not possible due to preventive measures or did not reflect risk‐taking in times of COVID‐19. In addition, COVID‐19 brought forth new behaviors deemed risky. With an aim to better predict risk‐taking in times of a pandemic, we introduce the Pandemic DOSPERT (PDOSPERT). We summarize three preregistered online studies with 1254 UK participants to validate the scale against the original DOSPERT and three other common risk‐taking measures. We also test its ability to predict pandemic risk‐related behaviors at three points in time over 2 years. Overall, we find that the PDOSPERT scale significantly improves predictions for pandemic‐related risk behavior as compared to the original DOSPERT. In particular, the health/safety subscale is significantly and strongly associated with pandemic‐related risk behavior. We not only validate a pandemic‐specific risk task but also introduce a template for developing context‐ and domain‐sensitive measures for risk‐taking in the future.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alcohol-Related Deaths During the COVID-19 PandemicJAMA, 2022
- How much risk can you stomach? Individual differences in the tolerance of perceived risk across gender and risk domainJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2019
- Time preferences and risk aversion: Tests on domain differencesJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2016
- From the user's perspective: Perceptions of risk relative to benefit associated with using the InternetComputers in Human Behavior, 2016
- Variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses: A natural experimentEuropean Economic Review, 2014
- Risk loving after the storm: A Bayesian-Network study of Hurricane Katrina evacueesJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2009
- A domain‐specific risk‐attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviorsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2002
- Protected Values and Omission BiasOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1999
- Status-quo and omission biasesJournal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1992
- Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguityJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1990