Online survey about the STROBE statement highlighted diverging views about its content, purpose, and value
Open Access
- 1 July 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 123, 100-106
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Marie Sklodowska-Curie (676207)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of researchBMC Veterinary Research, 2014
- Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic studyBMJ Open, 2011
- Why Observational Studies Should Be Among The Tools Used In Comparative Effectiveness ResearchHealth Affairs, 2010
- Editorial Policies of Pediatric JournalsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2010
- Assessing the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in CancerAnnals of Epidemiology, 2010
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009
- The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) StatementEpidemiology, 2007
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)Epidemiology, 2007
- Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2004
- Distribution of Study Designs in Four Major US Journals of Obstetrics and GynecologyGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 2001