Eco-friendly labeling biases judgments of environmental impact
Open Access
- 29 July 2025
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Psychology
- Vol. 106
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- National Plan for Scientific and Technical Research and Innovation (PID2021-126320NB-I00/MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033/ERDF)
- Basque Government
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación
- European Regional Development Fund (IT1696-22)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- New challenges and perspectives on the organic halo effect on calories estimation: A brief review and Meta-analysisFood Quality and Preference, 2025
- Short-term memory effects of eco-labeling: Evidence from the perceived environmental friendliness of sequential consumer behaviorFood Quality and Preference, 2024
- All's eco‐friendly that ends eco‐friendly: Short‐term memory effects in carbon footprint estimates of temporal item sequencesApplied Cognitive Psychology, 2024
- When Less is better: Messages that Present Dietary Carbon Emissions Data at the individual (vs. Aggregate) Level Increase Commitment to Sustainable Beef ConsumptionAppetite, 2022
- Environmental impact judgments of meat, vegetarian, and insect burgers: Unifying the negative footprint illusion and quantity insensitivityFood Quality and Preference, 2019
- The psychology of rebound effects: Explaining energy efficiency rebound behaviours with electric vehicles and building insulation in AustriaEnergy Research & Social Science, 2018
- The green halo: Mechanisms and limits of the eco-label effectFood Quality and Preference, 2015
- Sustainability labels on food products: Consumer motivation, understanding and useFood Policy, 2014
- Sustainable Development and the Consumer: Exploring the Role of Carbon Labelling in Retail Supply ChainsBusiness Strategy and the Environment, 2013
- OPTIMISM BIAS ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION: THE ROLE OF THE RANGE OF IMPACT OF PRECAUTIONSJournal of Environmental Psychology, 2001