Retrenchment under climate-driven risks in subsistence farming communities
Authors:
- Nicolas Choquette-LevyNCNicolas Choquette-Levy
- Dirgha GhimireDGDirgha Ghimire
- Michael OppenheimerMOMichael Oppenheimer
- Rajendra GhimireRGRajendra Ghimire
- Dil CkDCDil Ck
Open Access
- 20 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Population and Environment
- Vol. 47 (2)
Abstract
Increasing climate risks introduce new sources of uncertainty to smallholder farmers’ livelihood decisions. While farmers in different development contexts tend to accurately perceive long-term climatic trends, livelihood diversification as a climate resilience strategy has generally lagged behind awareness of climate risks. In this study, we investigate potential mechanisms behind this lagged response through a survey of 500 farming households in Nepal’s Chitwan Valley, a region that is highly dependent on subsistence agriculture and highly exposed to several climate-driven hazards. Specifically, we employ a suite of cross-sectional and time series econometric techniques to analyze how farmers’ information sources, social capital, and previous exposure to climate hazards shape climate risk perceptions and livelihood decisions. We find that climate-driven risks are highly salient to household perceptions of farming risks; however, they also drive higher perceived risks of common livelihood diversification strategies, including rural–urban migration and off-farm employment. Further, while farming households generally maintain diversified income portfolios, exposure to droughts and/or floods leads to persistent increases in the reliance on farming income, which we term a “retrenchment” response. We find evidence for both financial and psychological mechanisms behind this response, which may exacerbate environmentally driven poverty traps. Our results indicate that efforts to build farmers’ resilience to climate risks should especially account for perceived risks of livelihood alternatives, financial constraints, and loss-averse behavior in response to income shocks.Keywords
Funding Information
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (752-2020-077)
- High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University
- Princeton Institute for International and Regional Studies
- Princeton Center for Policy Research on Energy and the Environment
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD041028)
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonlinear permanent migration response to climatic variations but minimal response to disastersProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014
- Farmers’ Perceived Risks of Climate Change and Influencing Factors: A Study in the Mekong Delta, VietnamEnvironmental Management, 2014
- Understanding Farmer Perspectives on Climate Change Adaptation and MitigationEnvironment and Behavior, 2013
- IPCC Special Report on Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation (SREX)Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2012
- Natural disasters and population mobility in BangladeshProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Environmental change and out-migration: evidence from NepalPopulation and Environment, 2010
- Adapting agriculture to climate changeProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agricultureProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2007
- The Role of Aspiration Level in Risky Choice: A Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Theory and SP/A TheoryJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1999
- The Economics of Poverty in Poor CountriesThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1998