Predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches among adults living in Australia
Open Access
- 20 February 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-18
Abstract
There is a dearth of research comparing why dieting and non-dieting approaches are adopted. A greater understanding of reasons underlying dieting and non-dieting attempts will help to identify target beliefs for interventions to support and motivate adults to attempt whatever approach they are willing and/or able to pursue. We investigated the predictors of dieting and non-dieting approaches in Australian adults using predictors that were identified in a previous qualitative study. We conducted a prospective study, with two waves of data collection occurring 4 weeks apart. At baseline, participants completed a questionnaire assessing constructs drawn from the theory of planned behaviour (attitude, subjective norm, and self-efficacy), past behaviour, non-planning, attributions for dieting failure, weight control beliefs, and dieting and non-dieting intentions. We used path modelling to analyse responses. At baseline, 719 adults (52.2% male) aged between 18 and 76 completed the questionnaire. Four weeks later, 64% of participants (n = 461) reported on their dieting and non-dieting behaviour in the past month. Past behaviour, attitude, subjective norm, and self-identity significantly predicted dieting intentions. Dieting intentions and past behaviour significantly predicted dieting behaviour, while non-planning and self-efficacy did not. The model explained 74.8% of the variance in intention and 52.9% of the variance in behaviour. While most findings were similar for the non-dieting model, subjective norms and self-identity did not predict intention, while self-efficacy and self-identity both predicted non-dieting behaviour directly. The non-dieting model explained 58.2% of the variance in intention and 37.5% of the variance in behaviour. The findings from this study provide support for the application of TPB and identity theory constructs in the context of both dieting and non-dieting behaviour. Self-efficacy and self-identity appear more relevant to non-dieting behaviour than dieting behaviour, while subjective norms was more influential in predicting dieting. Practitioners wishing to encourage either approach in their clients should attempt to modify the constructs that influence each approach.Keywords
Funding Information
- Australian Postgraduate Award
This publication has 70 references indexed in Scilit:
- A qualitative study of the determinants of dieting and non-dieting approaches in overweight/obese Australian adultsBMC Public Health, 2012
- Male Inclusion in Randomized Controlled Trials of Lifestyle Weight Loss InterventionsObesity, 2012
- A cross-sectional study assessing the self-reported weight loss strategies used by adult Australian general practice patientsBMC Family Practice, 2012
- Successful Weight Loss Among Obese U.S. AdultsAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2012
- Weight Science: Evaluating the Evidence for a Paradigm ShiftNutrition Journal, 2011
- "The solution needs to be complex."Obese adults' attitudes about the effectiveness of individual and population based interventions for obesityBMC Public Health, 2010
- Development and Validation of the Mindful Eating QuestionnaireJournal of the American Dietetic Association, 2009
- The incidence of co-morbidities related to obesity and overweight: A systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Public Health, 2009
- "They all work...when you stick to them": A qualitative investigation of dieting, weight loss, and physical exercise, in obese individualsNutrition Journal, 2008
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999