Same family, different species: methodological conduct and quality varies according to purpose for five types of knowledge synthesis
- 1 April 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 96, 133-142
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence-Based Health Care ManagementEvaluation & the Health Professions, 2013
- Evidence of Effectiveness of Health Care Professionals Using Handheld Computers: A Scoping Review of Systematic ReviewsJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2013
- Pharmacological Treatment of Dementia: A Scoping Review of Systematic ReviewsDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2013
- Mapping Systematic Reviews on Atopic Eczema—An Essential Resource for Dermatology Professionals and ResearchersPLOS ONE, 2013
- A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011PLOS ONE, 2012
- Large‐System Transformation in Health Care: A Realist ReviewThe Milbank Quarterly, 2012
- Multiple systematic reviews: methods for assessing discordances of resultsInternal and Emergency Medicine, 2012
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
- Scoping studies: towards a methodological frameworkInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2005