Remote Microphone Hearing Aid Use Improves Classroom Listening, Without Adverse Effects on Spatial Listening and Attention Skills, in Children With Auditory Processing Disorder: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 21 August 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Vol. 14
Abstract
Background: Children with Auditory Processing Disorder (APD) often have poor auditory processing skills in the presence of normal peripheral hearing. These children have worse listening-in-noise skills compared to typically developing peers, while other commonly reported symptoms include poor attention and distractibility. One of the management strategies for children with APD is the use of Remote Microphone Hearing Aids (RMHAs), which can help improve the signal-to-noise ratio in the child’s ears. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to examine whether RMHAs improved classroom listening in children with APD, and to further test their effects on children’s listening-in-noise and attention skills following a 6-month intervention. Methods: Twenty-six children diagnosed with APD, aged 7–12, in primary mainstream education, were randomised into the intervention (N = 13) and control group (N = 13). The primary outcome measure was the Listening Inventory for Education – Revised questionnaire, completed by children to assess their listening using RMHAs under several acoustically challenging situations in the classroom. Secondary outcome measures included the Listening in Spatialised Noise – Sentences test, assessing speech-in-noise perception and spatial listening, and the Test of Everyday Attention for Children, assessing different types of attention skills. Tests were conducted in unaided conditions. Mixed analysis of variance was used to analyse the data. The clinical trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (unique identifier: NCT02353091). Results: The questionnaire scores of self-reported listening skills in the classroom significantly improved in the intervention group after 3, MD = 7.31, SE = 2.113, p = 0.014, and after 6 months, M = 5.00, SE = 1.468, p = 0.016. The behavioural measures of listening-in-noise and attention did not significantly change. Conclusion: Use of RMHAs improves classroom listening, evidenced by the results of the questionnaire analysis, while a 6-month use did not have adverse effects on unaided spatial listening or attention skills.Keywords
Funding Information
- Action Medical Research
This publication has 51 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assistive listening devices drive neuroplasticity in children with dyslexiaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- Development and Evaluation of the LiSN & Learn Auditory Training Software for Deficit-Specific Remediation of Binaural Processing Deficits in Children: Preliminary FindingsJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2011
- Speech perception in noise: Exploring the effect of linguistic context in children with and without auditory processing disorderInternational Journal of Audiology, 2011
- Intention-to-treat concept: A reviewPerspectives in Clinical Research, 2011
- Successful treatment of auditory perceptual disorder in individuals with Friedreich ataxiaNeuroscience, 2010
- Multiple benefits of personal FM system use by children with auditory processing disorder (APD)International Journal of Audiology, 2009
- Issues in Outcomes Research: An Overview of Randomization Techniques for Clinical TrialsJournal of Athletic Training, 2008
- Development of the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LISN-S)Ear & Hearing, 2007
- The listening in spatialized noise-sentences test (LISN-S): test-retest reliability studyInternational Journal of Audiology, 2007
- Non-Normality and Tests on VariancesBiometrika, 1953