Determination of the Adsorption Free Energy for Peptide−Surface Interactions by SPR Spectroscopy
- 29 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in Langmuir
- Vol. 24 (13) , 6721-6729
Abstract
To understand and predict protein adsorption behavior, we must first understand the fundamental interactions between the functional groups presented by the amino acid residues making up a protein and the functional groups presented by the surface. Limited quantitative information is available, however, on these types of submolecular interactions. The objective of this study was therefore to develop a reliable method to determine the standard state adsorption free energy (ΔGoads) of amino acid residue−surface interactions using surface plasma resonance (SPR) spectroscopy. Two problems are commonly encountered when using SPR for peptide adsorption studies: the need to account for “bulk-shift” effects and the influence of peptide−peptide interactions at the surface. Bulk-shift effects represent the contribution of the bulk solute concentration to the SPR response that occurs in addition to the response due to adsorption. Peptide−peptide interactions, which are assumed to be zero for Langmuir adsorption, can greatly skew the isotherm shape and result in erroneous calculated values of ΔGoads. To address these issues, we have developed a new approach for the determination of ΔGoads using SPR that is based on the chemical potential. In this article, we present the development of this new approach and its application for the calculation of ΔGoads for a set of peptide−surface systems where the peptide has a host−guest amino acid sequence of TGTG-X-GTGT (where G and T are glycine and threonine residues and X represents a variable residue) and the surface consists of alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) with methyl (CH3) and hydroxyl (OH) functionality. This new approach enables bulk-shift effects to be directly determined from the raw SPR versus peptide concentration data plots and the influence of peptide−peptide interaction effects to be minimized, thus providing a very straightforward and accurate method for the determination of ΔGoads for peptide adsorption. Further studies are underway to characterize ΔGoads for a large library of peptide−SAM combinations.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparison of solvation‐effect methods for the simulation of peptide interactions with a hydrophobic surfaceJournal of Computational Chemistry, 2007
- Adsorption Thermodynamics of Short-Chain Peptides on Charged and Uncharged Nanothin Polymer FilmsLangmuir, 2006
- Interpretation of Protein Adsorption: Surface-Induced Conformational ChangesJournal of the American Chemical Society, 2005
- Thermodynamic Studies on the Adsorption of Fibronectin Adhesion-Promoting Peptide on Nanothin Films of Poly(2-vinylpyridine) by SPRBiomacromolecules, 2004
- Self‐Assembled Monolayers into the 21st Century: Recent Advances and ApplicationsElectroanalysis, 2003
- A theoretical analysis of the thermodynamic contributions for the adsorption of individual protein residues on functionalized surfacesBiomaterials, 2002
- Theoretical analysis of adsorption thermodynamics for charged peptide residues on SAM surfaces of varying functionalityJournal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2002
- Understanding and controlling the bone–implant interfaceBiomaterials, 1999
- Effects of surface-coupled polyethylene oxide on human macrophage adhesion and foreign body giant cell formationin vitroJournal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1999
- Formation of monolayers by the coadsorption of thiols on gold: variation in the head group, tail group, and solventJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1989