DURATION‐2: efficacy and safety of switching from maximum daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone to once‐weekly exenatide
Authors:
Open Access
- 22 March 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Diabetic Medicine
- Vol. 28 (6) , 705-714
Abstract
Diabet. Med. 28, 705–714 (2011) Aims In the initial 26‐week, double‐blind, double‐dummy assessment period of the DURATION‐2 trial in patients with Type 2 diabetes on metformin, the once‐weekly glucagon‐like peptide 1 (GLP‐1) receptor agonist exenatide once‐weekly resulted in greater HbA1c improvement and weight reduction compared with maximum approved daily doses of sitagliptin or pioglitazone. This subsequent, 26‐week, open‐label, uncontrolled assessment period evaluated the safety and efficacy of (i) continued exenatide once‐weekly treatment and (ii) switching from sitagliptin or pioglitazone to exenatide once‐weekly.Methods Randomised oral medications were discontinued and all patients received exenatide once‐weekly. Of the 364 patients [original baseline HbA1c 8.5 ± 1.1% (70 mmol/mol), fasting plasma glucose 9.0 ± 2.5 mmol/l, weight 88 ± 20 kg) who continued into the open‐label period, 319 patients (88%) completed 52 weeks.Results Evaluable patients who received only exenatide once‐weekly demonstrated significant 52‐week improvements (least square mean ± se) in HbA1c (−1.6 ± 0.1%), fasting plasma glucose (−1.8 ± 0.3 mmol/l) and weight (−1.8 ± 0.5 kg). Evaluable patients who switched from sitagliptin to exenatide once‐weekly demonstrated significant incremental improvements in HbA1c (−0.3 ± 0.1%), fasting plasma glucose (−0.7 ± 0.2 mmol/l) and weight (−1.1 ± 0.3 kg). Patients who switched from pioglitazone to exenatide once‐weekly maintained HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose improvements (week 52: −1.6 ± 0.1%, −1.7 ± 0.3 mmol/l), with significant weight reduction (−3.0 ± 0.3 kg). Exenatide once‐weekly was generally well tolerated and adverse events were predominantly mild or moderate in intensity. Nausea was the most frequent adverse event in this assessment period (intent‐to‐treat: exenatide once‐weekly‐only 5%; sitagliptin → exenatide once‐weekly 11%; pioglitazone → exenatide once‐weekly 10%). No major hypoglycaemia was observed.Conclusions Patients who switched to once‐weekly exenatide from daily sitagliptin or pioglitazone had improved or sustained glycaemic control, with weight loss.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Once weekly exenatide compared with insulin glargine titrated to target in patients with type 2 diabetes (DURATION-3): an open-label randomised trialThe Lancet, 2010
- Roles of the Metabolic Syndrome, HDL Cholesterol, and Coronary Atherosclerosis in Subclinical InflammationDiabetes Care, 2010
- DURATION-1: Exenatide Once Weekly Produces Sustained Glycemic Control and Weight Loss Over 52 WeeksDiabetes Care, 2010
- Prevention of Diabetic Nephropathy by Tight Target Control in an Asian Population With Type 2 Diabetes MellitusArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2010
- B-Type Natriuretic Peptides and Cardiovascular RiskCirculation, 2009
- Medical Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Consensus Algorithm for the Initiation and Adjustment of TherapyDiabetes Care, 2009
- Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority studyThe Lancet, 2008
- Effects of exenatide versus sitagliptin on postprandial glucose, insulin and glucagon secretion, gastric emptying, and caloric intake: a randomized, cross-over studyCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2008
- Insulinotropic actions of exendin-4 and glucagon-like peptide-1 in vivo and in vitroMetabolism, 2001