A multi-center prospective cohort study of patient transfers from the intensive care unit to the hospital ward
- 29 August 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Intensive Care Medicine
- Vol. 43 (10) , 1485-1494
Abstract
Purpose To provide a 360-degree description of ICU-to-ward transfers. Methods Prospective cohort study of 451 adults transferred from a medical–surgical ICU to a hospital ward in 10 Canadian hospitals July 2014–January 2016. Transfer processes documented in the medical record. Patient (or delegate) and provider (ICU/ward physician/nurse) perspectives solicited by survey 24–72 h after transfer. Results Medical records (100%) and survey responses (ICU physicians–80%, ICU nurses–80%, ward physicians–46%, ward nurses–64%, patients–74%) were available for most transfers. The median time from initiation to completion of transfer was 25 h (IQR 6–52). ICU physicians and nurses reported communicating with counterparts via telephone (78 and 75%) when transfer was requested (82 and 24%) or accepted (31 and 59%) and providing more elements of clinical information than ward physicians (mean 4.7 vs. 3.9, p < 0.001) and nurses (5.0 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001) reported receiving. Patients were more likely to report satisfaction with the transfer when they received more information (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18–1.48), had their questions addressed (OR 3.96, 95% CI 1.33–11.84), met the ward physician prior to transfer (OR 4.61, 95% CI 2.90–7.33), and were assessed by a nurse within 1 h of ward arrival (OR 4.70, 95% CI 2.29–9.66). Recommendations for improvement included having a documented care plan travel with the patient (all stakeholders), standardized face-to-face handover (physicians), avoiding transfers at shift change (nurses) and informing patients about pending transfers in advance (patients). Conclusions ICU-to-ward transfers are characterized by failures of patient flow and communication; experienced differently by patients, ICU/ward physicians and nurses, with distinct suggestions for improvement.Keywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Frailty Network (CORE 2013-12A)
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Handoffs in the Era of Duty Hours ReformAcademic Medicine, 2012
- A Prospective Observational Study of Physician Handoff for Intensive-Care-Unit-to-Ward Patient TransfersThe American Journal of Medicine, 2011
- Content overlap in nurse and physician handoff artifacts and the potential role of electronic health records: A systematic reviewJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2011
- Strategies to Improve Care Transitions Between Nursing Homes and Emergency DepartmentsJournal of the American Medical Directors Association, 2010
- Effects of automated alerts on unnecessarily repeated serology tests in a cardiovascular surgery department: a time series analysisBMC Health Services Research, 2010
- Selected Medical Errors in the Intensive Care Unit: Results of the IATROREF Study: Parts I and IIAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2010
- Residents’ and Attending Physicians’ Handoffs: A Systematic Review of the LiteratureAcademic Medicine, 2009
- A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of cliniciansCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2008
- Communicating in the “Gray Zone”: Perceptions about Emergency Physician–hospitalist Handoffs and Patient SafetyAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2007
- Using thematic analysis in psychologyQualitative Research in Psychology, 2006