Universality of citation distributions–A validation of Radicchi et al.'s relative indicator c_f = c/c₀ at the micro level using data from chemistry

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
  Learned Publishing, 2009
• Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact
  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
• Does the Committee Peer Review Select the Best Applicants for Funding? An Investigation of the Selection Process for Two European Molecular Biology Organization Programmes
  PLOS ONE, 2008
• The Effectiveness of the Peer Review Process: Inter‐Referee Agreement and Predictive Validity of Manuscript Refereeing at Angewandte Chemie
  Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2008
• Selecting manuscripts for a high‐impact journal through peer review: A citation analysis of communications that were accepted by Angewandte Chemie International Edition, or rejected but published elsewhere
  Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2008
• Citation counts for research evaluation: standards of good practice for analyzing bibliometric data and presenting and interpreting results
  Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 2008
• What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior
  Journal of Documentation, 2008
• Lifting the crown—citation z-score
  Journal of Informetrics, 2007
• Who Is Going to Read all This?
  Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 2005
• Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
  Research Evaluation, 2004