Methodological Challenges and Preferred Approaches for the Economic Evaluation of CAR T Therapies: Evidence Review and Expert Consensus from NICE Appraisals
Open Access
- 9 October 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics
- p. 1-18
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Health Technology Assessment Programme (NIHR177737)
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost-Effectiveness of Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-Cell Therapy for Blood Cancers: An Updated Systematic ReviewPharmacoEconomics - Open, 2025
- Examining Consistency Across NICE Single Technology Appraisals: A Review of Appraisals for Paroxysmal Nocturnal HaemoglobinuriaPharmacoEconomics, 2025
- Recommendations on the Use of Structured Expert Elicitation Protocols for Healthcare Decision Making: A Good Practices Report of an ISPOR Task ForceValue in Health, 2024
- Economic Evaluations of Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapies for Hematologic and Solid Malignancies: A Systematic ReviewValue in Health, 2024
- Improved outcomes of large B‐cell lymphoma patients treated with CD19 CAR T in the UK over timeBritish Journal of Haematology, 2023
- Challenges raised by the economic evaluation of CAR-T-cell therapies. The review by the French National Authority for HealthBulletin du Cancer, 2021
- Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2019
- Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell LymphomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 2017
- Modeling Good Research Practices—Overview: A Report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-1Value in Health, 2012
- The qualitative content analysis processJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2008