Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 2: The Bayes Factor
- 15 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by American College of Physicians in Annals of Internal Medicine
- Vol. 130 (12) , 1005-1013
Abstract
Bayesian inference is usually presented as a method for determining how scientific belief should be modified by data. Although Bayesian methodology has been one of the most active areas of statistical development in the past 20 years, medical researchers have been reluctant to embrace what they perceive as a subjective approach to data analysis. It is little understood that Bayesian methods have a data-based core, which can be used as a calculus of evidence. This core is the Bayes factor, which in its simplest form is also called a likelihood ratio. The minimum Bayes factor is objective and can be used in lieu of the P value as a measure of the evidential strength. Unlike P values, Bayes factors have a sound theoretical foundation and an interpretation that allows their use in both inference and decision making. Bayes factors show that P values greatly overstate the evidence against the null hypothesis. Most important, Bayes factors require the addition of background knowledge to be transformed into inferences--probabilities that a given conclusion is right or wrong. They make the distinction clear between experimental evidence and inferential conclusions while providing a framework in which to combine prior with current evidence.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overcoming the limitations of current meta-analysis of randomised controlled trialsThe Lancet, 1998
- TUTORIAL IN BIOSTATISTICS: BAYESIAN DATA MONITORING IN CLINICAL TRIALSStatistics in Medicine, 1997
- A LIKELIHOOD APPROACH TO META-ANALYSIS WITH RANDOM EFFECTSStatistics in Medicine, 1996
- Bayesian Analysis and the GUSTO Trial1995
- Placing Trials in Context Using Bayesian AnalysisJAMA, 1995
- Decision analysis and Bayesian methods in clinical trials1995
- Reporting bayesian analyses of clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- A case for bayesianism in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 1993
- Why do we need systematic overviews of randomized trials? (Transcript of an oral presentation, modified by the editors)Statistics in Medicine, 1987
- Interim analyses in clinical trials: Classical vs. bayesian approachesStatistics in Medicine, 1985